Here's something you don't see very often:
"K2MO de AC6YY/M AC6YY/M fb tony thanks for the report, my rig is icom
7000 icom 7000 running about 25 25 watts into don johnson screwdriver
antenna. It's mounted on the top of the car and it is alsmost full size
20 meter vertical hi hi"
Tony -K2MO
I'm in the market for a DV-Dongle if anyone has one, and not using it and would
like to sale it ..You can get me off the list.
Thanks Russell NC5O
1- Whoever said nothing is impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
2- A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong e
Hope I'm not breaking any rules with this. I have a Rig Expert Tiny digital
modes interface for sale for $70.00 including USPS shipping. You can read
more about it at http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?t=260443&bq=1 .
73 & GUD DX,
Thomas F. Giella, NZ4O
Lakeland, FL, USA
n...@tampabay.rr.com
Please explain your comment! It's the first I've ever heard of PV systems
being RF noisey - this could be a major problem with the push for green
technologies!
73,
Jeff -- KE7ACY
CN94
- Original Message - From: Juergen
Don't forget the photovoltaic systems which are becoming ve
Can we persuade Dave (FLDIGI ) and Simon to follow suit?
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Patrick Lindecker wrote:
>
>
> Sholto, Simon and all,
>
>
> >confirmation email from a distant land.
> For information, in the last Multipsk version, I proposed this feature
> (confirmation email) for alm
Sholto, Simon and all,
>confirmation email from a distant land.
For information, in the last Multipsk version, I proposed this feature
(confirmation email) for almost all digital modes (including CW), through a
specific sting of characters using a particular protocol (using CRC).
The code (Pasca
I want one for xmas.
VE3BDR
From: Simon HB9DRV
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 3:37 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Solving the RSID problem once and for all
I think I'm working on the 'ultimate solution' here - a SDR radio and RSID
decoder where
Simon,
Yes that will be very interesting to see. My only thought about such a system
is the complexity & cost level for the average ham. Many of us on here lament
about people not using RS ID or not being interested enough to try some of the
more exotic modes. I don't see this ever significantl
I think I'm working on the 'ultimate solution' here - a SDR radio and RSID
decoder where the RSID decoder analyses between 11.025 and 88.2kHz of
bandwidth.
I already have a digital decoder built into the console, the RSID will then
alert me and with one click I'll be decoding it.
Next year I hope
Hello Sholto,
> In fact taking this idea a step forward, maybe it would be better to write
> an RS ID "front end" that all new digi mode programs could take advantage
> of. Maybe thru a DDE channel or tcp/ip. That way the RS ID
> detector/transmitter would be a
If decoding a RS ID code is a bit
Hi Simon,
My point is that most software that doesn't send RSID is not a problem at all
as they are limited to few modes. Does anyone on here not recognize RTTY
(MMTTY) or PSK31 & MFSK16 (TruTTY) by ear?
MixW is a separate point in case as it does have some advanced modes but there
is little c
But what about the software that doesn't send RSID?
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
http://sdr-radio.com
> -Original Message-
> From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of sholtofish
>
> I guess someone could write a helper application (say on the system
There isn't really any point for RSID in MMTTY or even TruTTY. They only do
limited modes and they are easy enough to recognize by ear.
I guess someone could write a helper application (say on the system tray) that
monitors the sound card continuously and flashes up a box with the detected
mode
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, mikea wrote:
>
> First it takes software support, which MixW lacks (Are you folks
> *LISTENING* to us, MixW developers?).
>
> I installed HRD and DM780 because MixW doesn't support RSID and I got so
> damn tired of failing to ID the correct mode/submode by
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:39:56AM -0400, Tony wrote:
> On 8/16/2010 7:01 AM, jon_g4fut wrote:
> >
> >I thoroughly agree with you Tony. It becomes a chore when one cannot
> >recognise a signals footprint and then has to click through all the
> >digital modes. THEN the wretched transmission ends b
15 matches
Mail list logo
