[digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick.

2007-02-18 Thread Frank Brickle
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Frank Brickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > This encapsulates perfectly and beautifully the fundamental flaw in > &g

[digitalradio] Re: Morphing Dave, Simon, and Patrick.

2007-02-18 Thread Frank Brickle
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "cesco12342000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its easy to build a client (maybe), its more complicated to build a > server, and it's hard to build a server which reliably can accept > and > handle multiple connections on one port ! This encapsulates perfectl

[digitalradio] Re: SDR-1000

2007-02-03 Thread Frank Brickle
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Robert McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a multiway exchange, Gerald said > explicitly that Linux would be first out of the gate on any new radio > with an embedded micro for dsp/sdr in it... ...but that the embedded micro version would be a small-vol

[digitalradio] Re: SDR-1000

2007-02-03 Thread Frank Brickle
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Walt DuBose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not going to spend $1500 for an SDR transceiver I can't run from Linux. Roger's website is the best source for information on getting started. There will be new information forthcoming by the end of the weekend. As

[digitalradio] Re: Vista emphasizes security over compatibility

2007-02-01 Thread Frank Brickle
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No way matey - I have used UNIX distributions where the username / password > was stored in plain text... This is a total red herring, of course. Triple-DES is no more secure than your newspaper cryptogram puzzle if

[digitalradio] Re: Digital software, 2 rigs and one PC?

2007-01-28 Thread Frank Brickle
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For hams, multiple virtual machines would let you simultaneously run > both Windows and Linux applications on the same PC. Multiple virtual > machines would also enable those developing applications to test > tho

[digitalradio] ALE CQ and ALE GPRS Re: SDRs Open Possibility for 18kHz Bandwidth HF Data?

2007-01-24 Thread Frank Brickle
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We also have adapted ALE to do APRS-like stuff. But we call it ALE-GPR. > > The ALE protocol, especially with what you can do with AMD, is flexible. And in any case none of this is the last word, especially when

[digitalradio] Re: SDRs Open Possibility for 18kHz Bandwidth HF Data?

2007-01-24 Thread Frank Brickle
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Walt DuBose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...I am looking for a > CD or DVD that has the Paul whiteman band with Gershwin at the piano playing > "Rhapsody in Blue" A 40's RCA 78 RPM record. My copy was stolen but I have the > RCA jacket. :-) Walt -- I had

[digitalradio] Re: Movement toward open digital software?

2007-01-14 Thread Frank Brickle
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No matter, the terms under which I use this code specifically disallow > redistribution. In other words, the *suppliers* of your support libraries have control over the distribution rights of *your own* code? Man, I

[digitalradio] Re: Movement toward open digital software?

2007-01-14 Thread Frank Brickle
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Spot on. I use a commercial library from Codejock - www.codejock.com - this > cannot be distributed. I also use other commercial libraries with similar > restrictions. I can only ship the runtime libraries or link th

[digitalradio] Re: Movement toward open digital software?

2007-01-13 Thread Frank Brickle
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am *not* making it open source, only the decoding DLL's. The UI will never > be open source as it uses copyrighted code. Copyright and Open Source are not opposites. Copyright ownership is the precise legal foundat