I would have to agree with Andy's observation that the 1 baud mode is as good
as using JT65a
With the advantage of being able to send more text in one transmission. It is a
very slow throughput though.
Very 73, Glenn (WB2LMV)
From: Howard Brown k...@yahoo.com
I just had my first QSO using ROS with Vicente (EA1GIH) ...Thank you Vicente!!!
I am really impressed with this new mode. My wish is for it to have an over
button so that after the text is typed I would be able to press the over
button. The over button would place the other stations call + my
Hello Toby,
Your suggestions sound fine with me. I'm sorry that I missed the second M
during our QSO. The band was just not there.
I'm wondering? How wide is this mode? I'm sure the RTTY stations must hear us
as well.
Very 73 to all, Glenn (WB2LMV)
From: Toby
, February 19, 2010 12:58:03 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS
Hi, Glenn.
Could you explain better the over button please. Put an example, please
Thank you
De: Glenn L. Roeser hillbillietrace@ yahoo.com
Para: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Enviado: vie
Hello to all,
I found this on the ARRL Site:
QST de W1AW
ARRL Bulletin 62 ARLB062
From ARRL Headquarters
Newington CT September 9, 1999
To all radio amateurs
SB QST ARL ARLB062
ARLB062 FCC relaxes rules for spread spectrum
The FCC has relaxed rules governing the use of spread spectrum
I just finished my very first ragchew using PSK63F...I am very impressed. I was
in QSO with Don (W1OER) and we were on 80 meters.
I was running my usual 5 watts and we compared my 5 watt signal using PSK31,
and then PSK63f.
Don reports that he got most of my print using the PSK31, but I was
It seems to me that we have been down this road before comparing the different
digital modes. One thing is for certain, no matter what modes there are that
may do much better than PSK31, 99% of all operators will always use PSK31.
It is almost impossible to get more than 3% of the operators to
. . . . . .
. . . . . ..
--- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Glenn L. Roeser hillbillietrace@ ...
wrote:
It seems to me that we have been down this road before comparing the
different digital modes. One thing is for certain, no matter what modes there
are that may do much better than PSK31, 99% of all operators
as it is especially confusing to see a PSK63 signal and not
have it decode because it is PSK63F. We will be adding PSK63F to fldigi very
shortly.
73
Skip KH6TY
Glenn L. Roeser wrote:
It seems to me that we have been down this road before comparing the different
digital modes. One thing
Gary,
I think that it is a very good idea. I would surely go into the Novice
sub-bands to work them. I for one see the Digital Modes as the future of
Amateur Radio. As the Digital Modes become more popular we are also going to
need more bandwidth. That will be something to think about as well.
Patrick has my vote, by far the most deserving.
Very 73 to all
Glenn (WB2LMV)
From: Siegfried Jackstien siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, December 10, 2009 11:13:55 AM
Subject: AW: [digitalradio] Nominations for 2009
11 matches
Mail list logo
