Ian Wade wrote:
>
> So you don't always need high tech aids when giving lectures. Good luck
> with yours.
>
Thank you for suggestion, Ian! Sounds interesting ("Baaa...")
Misko YT7MPB
Vojtech Bubnik wrote:
> With your ad-hoc approach you would either broadcast data to all nodes
> in the network (APRS approach), or broadcast routing tables (FlexNet
> approach) or broadcast request to connect (I don't know any such AX.25
> system). Would you be more specific about your approach?
Charles Brabham wrote:
> What you describe can be done but it would be a step back, not forward from
> Packet networking as we know it. - This assumes that you are talking about a
> network that covers a significant area and has a good number of users in it.
> Your idea would be most advantageo
ab8it wrote:
> I have a presentation that I have used at several ham clubs you could
> borrow from or use. It is a powerpoint and I could e-mail it to you
> if you like. Tom- AB8IT
>
Tom, I'd like to have it too. If you don't mind I would give you a
credit when I discuss about ham radio at scie
Hi all,
A description of One Laptop Per Child project (ACM Queue, Nov/Dec 2007)
suggested they had implemented a kind of a mesh networking which means a
laptop is also the infrastructure for 'relaying the Internet' ("If one
laptop in a village is connected to the Internet, they all are.")
What ma
expeditionradio wrote:
> A blatant example was what we saw with abolition of morse testing. If
> the old morse test wasn't enough to scare away the first generation of
> computer-raised youngsters, then the next generation of web kids was
> turned off by the vitriol spewed by those who fought to k
John Simon wrote:
> Yes many years ago VK2YKQ used to assess my FBB BBS using JNOS or another
> version od NOS. Please don't ask me what or how it was done, it is in the
> dim dank past. B-) Hope this helps and encourages you to continue.
>
> 73, John de VK2
Hi all,
The next thing I would like to experiment with, is to try the MD2/MD5
password exchange between two bbs's FBB<>JNOS: Several years ago, I
experimented with the automated FBB<>FBB password exchange, using Protus
utility made by Jesus EB5AGF. It worked great for not only forwarding
but for s
Mark Thompson wrote:
> AO-16 soundcard BPSK demodulator
>
Btw, is there a good site about using soundcards for VHF/UHF packet radio?
Misko
> Wouter Jan Ubbels PE4WJ has produced a JAVA 1200 bit/s BPSK AX.25 soundcard
> demodulator for a PC.
>
> This is especially useful for the Amateur Radio
ely to work with settings
for ISA cards.
Thanks for suggestion,
Misko YT7MPB
> Jose, CO2JA
>
> Miroslav Skoric (YT7MPB) wrote:
>
>
>>Recently I changed the network card to one based on 3c905-tx chip. It
>>makes me wonder how to make it working with Linux Mandrake
Recently I changed the network card to one based on 3c905-tx chip. It
makes me wonder how to make it working with Linux Mandrake 9.1 ? It is a
PCI card (before it I used an ISA card that worked fine, but I moved it
to another comp).
Misko YT7MPB
Rick, KV9U wrote:
> As one who has probably had the most classes in my area to bring in new
> hams over several decades, there is no question that the new entrants
> tend to not be near as motivated as we once had. That is because it
> brings in a larger number of those who have more of a super
Jose A. Amador wrote:
>
> Misko,
>
> You need a JNOS executable compiled for a 286. I did so some 9 years ago
> and had my JNOS versions for DOS custom compiled. You need some Borland
> compiler, I used BC 3 back then.
>
Hello Jose, tnx for reply. Well I managed to get various installation
t
Hello to all,
I plan to make some test with JNOS or other derivatives and wonder what
versions of *NOS might be ok for my old 80286 PC AT (12 MHz CPU, 1MB
RAM, cca 10MB free space on HDD). That old comp I use now to telnet to
my Pentium box running LinFBB/WinFBB. I might be interested in making
Hello to all,
I plan to make a promotion of the amateur digital radio, packet in
particular, during a scientific event ACM-SIGCSE ITiCSE 2007 - Inclusive
Education in Computer Science, 12th
Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science
Education, 25-27th June 2007, Universit
KV9U wrote:
>
> Rather, they are mostly interested in working some simplex and some
> repeaters and more rarely now, some packet. And many of them eventually
> let their license expire. I do like the ARRL's proposal that we need to
> make HF available to new hams. In fact, the thought that ham
Patrick Lindecker wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
> We have done a short experimentation in APRS Packet 110 bauds, Fred
> (OH/DK4ZC) repeating the frames ("digipeater").
>
> It works well. The signal must be good but not so powerful as in Packet 300
> bauds. So I could exchange APRS frames with Fred
doc kd4e bibleseven.com wrote:
>
> Automatic modes make sense for non-technical
> marine and other specialty apps but not for
> Amateur Radio operators. We know how to listen
> for an open freq, how to send a CQ, and other
> such skills.
>
IMHO, some kind of 'automatic' mode should exist -
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
>
> The number of digital modes is amazing and new ones come along
> regularly, thanks to the selflessness of so many talented ham radio
> operator software programmers. To name a few: AMTOR, CW, DominoEX,
> Hellschreiber, PSK, MFSK16, Olivia MFSK, PACTOR, RTTY, SSTV,
Jerry wrote:
>Have the following books, if interested contact me off the relfector.
>
>
>
...
>I know my heirs would toss these in trash when I pass on,
>they are not interested in radio or it's history.
>
>Taking offers and purchase would include shipping CONUS only!
>
>Jerry - K0HZI
>
>
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
