Re: [digitalradio] Re: Narrow?

2007-03-08 Thread Rich Mulvey
Roger J. Buffington wrote: John Becker wrote: At 09:03 PM 3/7/2007, you wrote in part: The cw,rtty, data subbands are considered narrow mode, This is really good to know. It should put a stop to all the complaining that has been going on about the RTTY AMTOR and PACTOR signals

Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info

2007-03-08 Thread Rich Mulvey
Kurt wrote: - I'm afraid that there is no simple solution to the problem of who is working what mode where. But each operator must be diligent to try as best possoble not to QRM another signal on the portion of the band that they are working. Walt and others this is the problem. We are

Re: [digitalradio] Pactor versus Olivia

2007-01-10 Thread Rich Mulvey
Andrew O'Brien wrote: I actually had my first Pactor QSO today, there was a ham calling CQ on 40M Pactor 1 FEC. After working him via Pactor, we tried to compare Olivia versus Pactor going down to 1 watt, both were 100% copy. We were about 100 miles apart. What BW/tones were you using

Re: [digitalradio] RTTY Contest on 17M

2007-01-07 Thread Rich Mulvey
Danny Douglas wrote: Probably some of our new upgraded people who have no idea that contesting is disallowed on the WARC bands. They will find out in one of two ways: They will give a nice letter from the FCC, or the sponsor will disallow their entry in the contest for illegal

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARQ sound card modes

2006-09-16 Thread Rich Mulvey
DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA wrote: Where can I get an SCS Pactor TNC for $300 with the license to run Pactor III? They are out there. I purchased a SCS PTC-II with P3 license and dual packet boards for $450.00 last December, from someone on the TAPR APRS list. You just have to be

Re: [digitalradio] Anyone using a Cushcraft R5/ R7 on digital ?

2006-04-29 Thread Rich Mulvey
Andrew O'Brien wrote: I have an R7 and use if on all bands. I do not get any RF into the computer except for 80M. Andy K3UK On 4/29/06, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'd like to have an offline discussion with someone who is using a vertical, and if they solved RF problems

Re: [digitalradio] Re: email to Internet without a PC ?

2006-02-23 Thread Rich Mulvey
KV9U wrote: I would caution anyone from trying to set up a dual boot system. I had done this a number of times and had pretty good luck but also have had one case where I managed somehow to damage the MBR (Master Boot Record) with the Linux install and had to totally redo the drive from

Re: [digitalradio] Re: unknown garbage trashes QSO

2006-01-27 Thread Rich Mulvey
F.R. Ashley wrote: Rich It sounds very much like a MT-63 signal, but its not, hi.. I have no clue as to what it is, That was my first thought, but there's no apparent modulation - just wideband noise. If nothing else, someone had some really, really warm finals, as there wasn't a

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Olivia frequencies

2006-01-24 Thread Rich Mulvey
Tim Gorman wrote: On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:40, Steve Waterman, k4cjx wrote: Buddy, Why is the Amateur service more a free e-mail system to over-the-air licensed operators any more than it is a free phone system for those who use phone? I don't see anything in the 3rd party