Roger J. Buffington wrote:
John Becker wrote:
At 09:03 PM 3/7/2007, you wrote in part:
The cw,rtty, data subbands are considered narrow mode,
This is really good to know. It should put a stop to all the
complaining that has been going on about the RTTY AMTOR and PACTOR
signals
Kurt wrote:
-
I'm afraid that there is no simple solution to the problem of who
is working what mode where. But each operator must be diligent to
try as best possoble not to QRM another signal on the portion of the
band that they are working.
Walt and others this is the problem. We are
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
I actually had my first Pactor QSO today, there was a ham calling CQ
on 40M Pactor 1 FEC. After working him via Pactor, we tried to
compare Olivia versus Pactor going down to 1 watt, both were 100%
copy. We were about 100 miles apart.
What BW/tones were you using
Danny Douglas wrote:
Probably some of our new upgraded people who have no idea that
contesting is disallowed on the WARC bands. They will find out in one
of two ways: They will give a nice letter from the FCC, or
the sponsor will disallow their entry in the contest for illegal
DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA wrote:
Where can I get an SCS Pactor TNC for $300 with the license to run
Pactor III?
They are out there. I purchased a SCS PTC-II with P3 license and dual
packet boards for $450.00 last December, from someone on the TAPR APRS list.
You just have to be
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
I have an R7 and use if on all bands. I do not get any RF into the
computer except for 80M.
Andy K3UK
On 4/29/06, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to have an offline discussion with someone who is using a
vertical, and if they solved RF problems
KV9U wrote:
I would caution anyone from trying to set up a dual boot system. I had
done this a number of times and had pretty good luck but also have had
one case where I managed somehow to damage the MBR (Master Boot Record)
with the Linux install and had to totally redo the drive from
F.R. Ashley wrote:
Rich
It sounds very much like a MT-63 signal, but its not, hi.. I have no
clue
as to what it is,
That was my first thought, but there's no apparent modulation - just
wideband noise. If nothing else, someone had some really, really warm
finals, as there wasn't a
Tim Gorman wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:40, Steve Waterman, k4cjx wrote:
Buddy,
Why is the Amateur service more a free e-mail system to over-the-air
licensed operators any more than it is a free phone system for those
who use phone? I don't see anything in the 3rd party
