Was listening to 30M this evening between 10.118 and 10.140 and there is
a digital signal that occupies the entire space between 120 and 140.
multi tones spaced about 5 to to 7hz apart. Only hearing it on 30M
Anyone else hearing it or do I have some new local noise maker in
action. Signal e
When you see the call in the window left click on it and it will
automatically transfer to the logging screen, not the log book file yet,
that happens when your done with the QSO, there you can also transfer
the name and qth and state, lotw et, just highlight the text and right
click I think (
er.
>
>If you give 12000 a try, please let me (us) know the results.
>
>By the way, I use the MixW SSTV method against WWV for calibration on
>receive. I usually set transmit to the same value assuming it is using
>the same clocks. Not sure of this assumption.
>
>Regards
Yes, you guest it, right during the RTTY test I lost audio in, thought I
had a bad cable or lose connection, but no, the dam sound card
(Soundblaster 16bit) just stopped working. So in the mean time I
decided to drop back and use the on board sound card. I then check the
calibration against W
Scott, Rich.
I have had several on the air test using the 16/500 and 8/500 mode of
Olivia and the DominoEX up on 80 meters.with settings of 11 and 8 Baud
Distance to the other station was in the 700 mile range, Florida to MD.
We had good copy in MD both Olivia and DominoEX when I was running 5
Jerry,
Although your pic didn't reflect what you may have seen and heard was a
new mode called RTTYM or MRTTY, I believe. A new **.dll is circulating
that works in MixW. I responded to one using Olivia and the other
station switched. Another new digital mode on the horizon
Ron W4LDE
Jerry
Problem with 30 meters is the rapid band change that occurs in the
evenings, 40 is somewhat better for Stateside coverage then goes long
and then later 80 meters is FB but eventually goes long! From 7-9PM EST
40 is the best, before that time 30 meters and after that time 80 meters.
Ron W4LDE
Andy,
I;ll check in so you won't be alone! I say go for it why not. Someone
usually takes the leed, your idea go for it.
Ron W4LDE
obrienaj wrote:
>Would be a stupid idea to suggest a digital net? Perhaps now that
>the winter months are approaching in the northern hemisphere, we
>may ha
Have for sale an INRAD 70 MHz amplifier, (Extra unit) with
documentation. Works FB
If interested make an offer direct to [EMAIL PROTECTED],rr,com
73's Ron W4LDE
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo
Thanks Mark,
Makes it easier to understand.
Ron W4LDE
Mark Miller wrote:
>At 10:55 AM 10/1/2005, you wrote:
>
>
>>most of the user are
>>using the lower bandwidth on 30 and lower since we have limited space
>>and its share more with SSB, RTTY and the other digital modes..
>>
>>
>
>
>Ye
Mark,
Thanks for your info. on the tones/bandwidth, most of the user are
using the lower bandwidth on 30 and lower since we have limited space
and its share more with SSB, RTTY and the other digital modes.. The 16
tones 500Hz width gives us about a 20 WPM while the 8 - 500 provides us
with
Andy,
Looks like a 500Hz width signal, looks like your set for a 1000Hz width,
OR it could be a CHIP64 signal, width looks about right. Looks more
like chip64 than a Olivia signal to me, wish I could here it!
20 meters and higher most use a 1000Hz wide Olivia, some call it
standard mode with
Dave,
Another thought, depending on what center frequency for the audio
decoding may well determine what USB transmit frequency we recommend.
For those using OLIVIA on 40 meters the center of the signal is 750Hz,
on 20 meters the center is 1000Hz since on 20 meters its a 1000Hz wide
signal. C
lucky enough to get on
> with the bandwidth limitation.
> Yes I did just use 2 macro buttons for the (*) and (^T).
>
> Joe
> W4JSI
>
> ----- Original Message -
> *From:* Ron Walters <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
05 12:21 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: new digital modes CHIP64 and
>>>CHIP128 by IZ8BLY
>>>
>>>
>>> Joe I would recommend 7.090 as a starter and probably 14.10850 to
>>> establish a QSO and then maybe move a few up or down?
>>>
>&
Nino
I use Logger 32 as my main logging program and the MT63 packaged works
great!
IF you need me to check it out please advise
Ron W4LDE
Nino Porcino (IZ8BLY) wrote:
>>I am guessing that the problem in Logger32 is a 32 bit program and Nino's
>>programs are 16 bit.
>>
>>
>>
>
>no, both a
Good idea Dave, that leaves 7.090 for the Olivia, MT63 users.
Or we can always start there via a CQ and then QSY?
PS - There is a new group on Yahoo, CHIP64
Ron
David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD wrote:
>may be a little early to establish a standard but...
>
>monitoring several qso's on 70895
Yes, thats what I am doing, logging it as a RTTY QSO with the CHIP in
the comment field, electronic QSL services such as E-QSL transfers the
comment section to the QSL card and therefor the other station can
confirm the QSO if he is also using the RTTY field. We do have the same
problem with O
> CHIP128 by IZ8BLY
> >
> >
> > Joe I would recommend 7.090 as a starter and probably 14.10850 to
> > establish a QSO and then maybe move a few up or down?
> >
> > Ron W4LDE
> >
> >
> > - Origi
Great news Leigh, I wasn't sure of the actual requirements and thanks
for that update, heard WD4KPD calling CQ on 7090 and could not help it
and called him back, we tried all of the modes both clocked and
unclocked and running just 10 watts between FL and NC we had a very nice
QSO. Looks like
Paul,
I wasn't a worried and ran the .exe file and it correctly loaded the
software. There is no help file at this time.
If you used Nino's other great programs then it is easy to get around
and at this time looks complete, just wish I had more info!
The really big issue is will the source co
Buddy,
I do have to agree that the first time use of MultiPSK seems cumbersome,
however, after a few uses it got real easy and has a lot of features
other programs that cost big dollars do not have.
OLIVIA and MT63 plus lots of other including a new CW program using FSK
are all a part of the f
MixW
>>won't allow me to change the mode to OLIVIA so I upload them as
>>
>>
>MT63
>
>
>>and use the "Notes" to specify the mode was OLIVIA.
>>Rich K2TFT
>>
>>P.S. Gave up on LOTW2566 up and 129 returned.
>> EQ
Paul,
I just unzipped 3.10 and load over the existing files and every thing
came up running FB, all of the saved data was OK after the download and
unzip
Ron W4LDE
Paul wrote:
>I downloaded the new MultiPSK program but I didn't see a
>recommendation for installing over the top of the old ver
Danny,
Thanks for the comments, I have no intention of giving up on LOTW or for
that matter E-QSL. They both provide a service to hams world wide.
I agree that it is funny that the actual ROR is lower than I initially
expected but that seems to be the normal rate <20%, when I first started
us
and 129 returned.
> EQSL ~ 90% return.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Ron Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I have asked this question before and yet do not feel comfo
a little problem, I will add
>an option to permits not to scan and not to verify the Com port before using
>(but by default, I will propose scanning and checking).
>I will propose this in 3.10 version.
>
>73
>Patrick
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Ron
Many of the help files are WEB based and not a part of the download. Do
you have a web connection when you ask for "Help"?
Ron W4LDE
jhaynesatalumni wrote:
>Well I found a web site where I could download the complete
>Internet Explorer 5.5 and installed it. And now help in
>MMTTY works, but
> I have tested MultiPSK 3.9 and keying works well for both RTS and RTS*
> on WinXP.
> Don't forget to add macro text directives to each used macro.
>
> 73 Jozef
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From: Ron Walters
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday
Yes
Ron-W4LDE
Mel wrote:
>I have a PK 232 MBX which I purchased 10 years ago, sitting in a
>cupboard. Can it be used with a computer with Windows 98.?
>
>Any help appreciated, 73, Mel G0GQK
>
>
>
>
>The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
>More info at http:///www.
Tom,
You're correct, 30 meters is a great band both for cw and digital. I
have had many FB QSO's up around 10.138 on PSK, MFSK, MT63 and RTTY.
Nice thing I like about the band is it is a low noise band here in the
South during the heavy QRM band. Do not have the SSB stations like we
get up
Presently running a home made soundcard interface with a FT-1000mp but
it (Soundcard interface) has draw backs, no FSK keying or CW keying. I
miss the sharp filter that the rtty and packet modes in the FT1000mp
provided plus the FSKing
PC is short on serial and parallel ports, it is a 1.8Mhz
Harv,
Can one get the bootable disk files off the net and create the CD?
Ron - W4LDE
Harv Nelson wrote:
>Never fear LINUX is here!
>
>The new gMFSK has all the modes in one package.
>
>The bootable CD is in the mail for you.
>
>Harv, AI9NL
>
>
>On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:40 -0500, Gregory
Guy's
I am running Win98SE and have OLIVIA up and running without many
problems. I ran the reg file to update the registry and added the
cygwin section, everything is working fine. The TX window and RX run
under two (2) old PIF style windows and the TXR runs under one split
window. The ty
Andy,
When I connect or should I say try, I get a forceful reject message
Ron W4LDE
obrienaj wrote:
>I have moved the cluster software to a faster, more reliable, PC on
>my network. That was no small accomplishment since the Cluster
>software was not friendly to a simple transfer. I need
Rick,
Does other telnet spots work?
Rick Scott wrote:
>--- Ron Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Scotty
>>
>>Just checked it at address 208.15.25.196 port 23 and
>>works OK
>>
>>Ron W4LDE
>>
>>
>
&
Scotty
Just checked it at address 208.15.25.196 port 23 and works OK
Ron W4LDE
n7hj wrote:
>Trying to put K3UK with Port 23 in cluster window and cannot seem to
>get spots up.
>
>Anyone get it to work ??
>
>Scotty N7HJ
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15
37 matches
Mail list logo
