ps.com] On
Behalf Of Andy obrien
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 5:58 PM
To: digitalradio
Subject: [digitalradio] ALE and "protected frequencies" in the USA
I have received three emails in the past 3-4 weeks suggesting that the
FCC has an application to "protect" certain
Tony wrote:
>
>
> Sounds fishy to me Andy...
I'm heavily involved in Worldwide ALE activity & hflink.net operations
and can tell you I have no awareness of any such thing.
I suspect it's residual FUD (fear, uncertainty & doubt) flowing over
from QRZ.com. :-)
Have fun,
Alan
km4ba
From the regulations:
Sec. 97.101 General standards. (a) In all respects not specifically
covered by FCC Rules each amateur station must be operated in accordance
with good engineering and good amateur practice. (b) Each station
licensee and each control operator must cooperate in selecting
t
Sounds fishy to me Andy...
Tony -K2MO
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 6:57 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ALE and "protected frequencies" in
the USA
I have received three emails in the past 3-4 weeks
sugge
I have head in the past of folks of 'reminded' using the ALE frequencies
for other modes is frowned upon. I personally never heeded the advice
as I am of the opinion that if the frequency in not in use, then it's up
for grabs.
I have not heard about any proposal on the table about a proposal to
e
I have received three emails in the past 3-4 weeks suggesting that the
FCC has an application to "protect" certain HF frequencies and
reserve for exclusive ALE use. Two emails also suggest that people
operating on ALE frequencies have received emails asking them to NOT
use the frequencies . Is t