Re: [digitalradio] Comments on the JT65A and Olivia contests

2008-01-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew O'Brien wrote: > Of the 15 or so logs received so far, the comments appear to be. > > The bands (40 and 20M) were in very poor conditions > > I'm sorry that I wasn't able to be as active as I wanted to be. A family illness and a guest staying overnight on New Years Eve/New Years Day ha

Re: [digitalradio] Comments on the JT65A and Olivia contests

2008-01-01 Thread John Simon
es re-elected, because they couldn't live under the laws that they have passed! - Original Message - From: "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "DIGITALRADIO" ; "WSJT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 1:25 PM

[digitalradio] Comments on the JT65A and Olivia contests

2008-01-01 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Of the 15 or so logs received so far, the comments appear to be. The bands (40 and 20M) were in very poor conditions Both Olivia and JT65A contests were considered "tough". Activity was , according to early reports, higher in the JT65A mode . Several JT65A WSJT users had difficulty handing a "