Re: [digitalradio] Digital Voice Repeaters on HF (Re: Nearly Vacant HF Spectrum)

2007-05-13 Thread bruce mallon
AND if this is true why are they not legal now? --- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would you like to show us those frequency's? And would you like to show them when the MUF gets that high. Hi Bruce, Digital Voice repeaters, using

Re: [digitalradio] Digital Voice Repeaters on HF (Re: Nearly Vacant HF Spectrum)

2007-05-13 Thread bruce mallon
Now I'm not a big 12 meter guy but from what i remember it gets packed when open. On 10 meters 29.000 - 29.200 has classic AM, 29.2 - 29.5 used to have some satellite users ... IF you could show under OPEN band conditions it might work you might have something HOWEVER E-Skip can come and go

Re: [digitalradio] Digital Voice Repeaters on HF (Re: Nearly Vacant HF Spectrum)

2007-05-13 Thread Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
I would love to try a DV repeater on upper HF...10m soulds like the perfect spot. Repeaters are legal there and phone is legal so it should be? Also, on 17m don't go below 18.068, hihi. 73, Leigh/WA5ZNU

[digitalradio] Digital Voice Repeaters on HF (Re: Nearly Vacant HF Spectrum)

2007-05-13 Thread Howard Brown
OK, I will ask... Am I correct in assuming that rules would need to change to allow automatic operation? Is it right to think the only improvement in communications would be extending ground wave (since this would happen when the bands were not open)? What would happen when the bands did open?

Re: [digitalradio] Digital Voice Repeaters on HF (Re: Nearly Vacant HF Spectrum)

2007-05-13 Thread w6ids
@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 9:14 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Digital Voice Repeaters on HF (Re: Nearly Vacant HF Spectrum) OK, I will ask... SNIP SNIP Is the primary purpose to use the bands so we don't lose them?