Digital_modes
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digital_modes/?yguid=341090159
- Original Message -
From: Dave Sparks
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
The problem with worrying about
g
- Original Message -
From: Dave Sparks
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
The problem with worrying about "people interfering with this hobby", you
have to narrowly d
.
--
Dave Sparks
AF6AS
- Original Message -
From: DANNY DOUGLAS
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
Back to the anology. Auto (ground based) speed have nothing to do with
aircraft sp
AF6AS
- Original Message -
From: DANNY DOUGLAS
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 4:39 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
That is exactly the question. The next person may say that 9.6 is too slow
for him. W
From: DANNY DOUGLAS
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 4:39 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
That is exactly the question. The next person may say that 9.6 is too slow
for him. We refer back to the speed limit on road, and knowi
Want and should must yield to shall and will; the Rules tell us how fast we
may go in different parts of our authorized spectrum.
Cortland
KA5S
> [Original Message]
> From: obrienaj
> To:
> Date: 10/27/2009 10:02:08 PM
> Subject: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
>
/?yguid=341090159
- Original Message -
From: obrienaj
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:01 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
but Dave, ...how would we define "get the job done". I might feel I need to
transfer my
- Original Message -
From: "obrienaj"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 7:01 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Fast/Wide Slow/Narrow
> but Dave, ...how would we define "get the job done". I might feel I need
> to transfer my message at 9600 baud on HF but o
but Dave, ...how would we define "get the job done". I might feel I need to
transfer my message at 9600 baud on HF but others might argue I should be
patient and accept a 300 baud transfer.
Andy
>
> What we really need
> is a rule that says you should use the minimum bandwidth needed to ge
