Title: RE: [digitalradio] OK, so do we think PAX2 is any good?
I have to jump in here...
Any HF digital mode that uses more than 45-50 baud on a single tone carrier that does not have the ability to regress to a 45-50 baud rate is going to get clobbered on HF much of the time. Years of
If I understand it correctly, the PAX modes do use the Olivia 8 tone
modulation form. The difficulty that I see is that in order to get a
useful throughput (and even PAX2 is not all that fast) the baud rate is
very high at 125 baud. Too high for difficult conditions on HFespecially
on the lower
--
From:
Andrew
O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:36
PM
Subject: [digitalradio] OK, so do we
think PAX2 is any good?
I have played around with PAX2 for 24 hours now. Does
anyone here think it is of any real use? Patrick has desig
radio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 4:36
PM
Subject: [digitalradio] OK, so do we
think PAX2 is any good?
I have played around with PAX2 for 24 hours now. Does
anyone here think it is of any real use? Patrick has designed a
useful program in terms of the mailbox, beacon
I have played around with PAX2 for 24 hours now. Does anyone here
think it is of any real use? Patrick has designed a useful program in
terms of the mailbox, beacon, and connect mode functions, but I have
found it to be not robust enough for reliable HF operations. If we
could get all the ca
