>I've heard comments about "The FCC is looking into this" every now
> and then, but I've never seen anyone provide an actual cite that
> indicates they've done anything more than say, in effect, "Exercise good
> amateur practice and listen, first." Can you provide a more substantial
> refe
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 20:17, Rich Mulvey wrote:
> kd4e wrote:
> > > I mean, it ALWAYS ends up going like this:
> > >
> > > "I don't like P3/Winlink/Automated stations."
> > > "Why? They comply with FCC rules and the FCC has never had an
> > > issue with them."
> >
> > They actually live in so
kd4e wrote:
> > I mean, it ALWAYS ends up going like this:
> >
> > "I don't like P3/Winlink/Automated stations."
> > "Why? They comply with FCC rules and the FCC has never had an
> > issue with them."
>
> They actually live in some significant gray areas and the FCC
> has expressed some concerns a
> I mean, it ALWAYS ends up going like this:
>
> "I don't like P3/Winlink/Automated stations."
> "Why? They comply with FCC rules and the FCC has never had an
> issue with them."
They actually live in some significant gray areas and the FCC
has expressed some concerns as to the future of the tech
