I agree Jim, ALE400 would make sense. In general, the current failing of
standard ALE to take off are , I think, linked to attempts to popularize
ALE for emcomm use. While ALE concepts do lend themselves to emergency
communication nets, the gist of this thread is related to plain old ham
radio,
Hi Andy,
Dropped in to see if I needed to reply to anything from yesterday and I see
that you really have a number of members on this forum that seem to have a lot
of personal gripes and also make a lot of negative comments about BW and what
is and is not appropropriate for use on Amateur
Hi Andy,
I made mention of years ago via this forum that AQC-ALE is the the solution to
your desires in these areas and that is still true and the neew features I have
coded into PC-ALE and those that I am currntly working on will aid you in your
pursuits.
AQC-ALE ( which is only found in
I fully agree Steve, it sounds like the way to go. I only have 1.062H, will
have to check to see if I have the new features.
Andy K3UK
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:07 PM, N2CKH n2...@morrisbb.net wrote:
Hi Andy,
I made mention of years ago via this forum that AQC-ALE is the the solution
to
I think it's fair to discuss, which is to say question, whether
military standard ALE is the best thing to use on amateur
frequencies. It's good to make use of existing standards when
they fit the situation, but military radio is not amateur radio.
With our crowded bands, and with amateur radios
Andy,
Some great ideas there. I had also suggested a couple months ago the idea of a
universal CQ mode that could be an extension of the RSID/CallID that Patrick
has developed. The software should include S/N measurement that can be used to
suggest some the possible modes to switch to for
Hello Ed!
How would ALE serve well as a CQ Calling Mode?
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN Em79NV
- Original Message -
From: ed_hekman ehek...@cox.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 1:45 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: A new concept in digital mode band plans-
Howard,
With PSK all the activity is concentrated in a small segment of the band that
we can monitor on the waterfall. If someone calls CQ outside that segment
there is a very low probability that someone else will happen to be tuning
there, hear the CQ and respond.
I think the concept
Just to make myself clear, I am not suggesting that we actually use the
standard ALE digital mode for calling CQ. I'd be fine with it, but it is
quite wide and would start a debate all over again. I'm also not suggesting
we use ALE-style soundings that are unattended. What I like about the
I hope no one is deleting this thread. It's something to chew on slowly.
Thanks, Guys. Interesting reads, both.
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN EM79NV
- Original Message -
From: Andy obrien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 5:39 PM
Subject: Re:
10 matches
Mail list logo
