Seems well founded. Even when HF operation has been traditionally on
JT65A, the wider modes
(JT65B and JT65C) might prove better, in spite of being wider (ugh !!
horror, more wide modes !!...he, he)
Nevertheless, I am not sure but I believe that JT65C is not even 1 kHz
wide.
73,
Jose, CO2JA
Hi Patrick.
Why do you think to propose JT65 to your program. It would be quite
nice to be able to do far QSOs with a Pocket PC and a small mobile QRP
station.
I am not convinced that unmodified JT65 is a good idea on HF as the
tone spacing is 2.69 Hz. It must be sensitive to doppler, polar
