automatically extinguished with the delete key.
73 Matt KI6NCU in Northern CA. KI6NCU-1 on 145.050
-Original Message-
From: John Simon [mailto:jrsi...@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 8:09 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams
:
From: Dave Bernstein aa...@ambersoft.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:25 PM
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, bruce mallon wa4...@... wrote:
I strongly disagree. Your post is just
Bernstein aa...@...
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:25 PM
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, bruce mallon wa4gch@ wrote:
I strongly disagree. Your post is just another variant
Your response above does not clarify your original post; if anything, it
increases the ambiguity
NO IT ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION .
Same old stuff its digital or the highway .
Have a nice day
Bruce
This is not a productive interaction, Bruce. I disagreed with someone who
insisted that others operate as he did, and you come back with Same old stuff
its digital or the highway, a complete non sequitur.
We're done.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, bruce
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Brent Gourley bg...@... wrote:
But humans provided the emcom traffic to the machines, and the
machines at
the far end of the communication deliver it to humans. Without the
humans,
there is no communication.
I agree. What I was referring to are
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Christian Crayton
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 9:05 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Brent
...@bellsouth.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 12:51 PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Christian Crayton
Sent: Sunday, March 08
between speed and required accuracy.
KE4MZ, Brent
Dothan, AL
bg...@comcast.net
www.wb4zpi.org
- Original Message -
From: Christian Crayton n5...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 6:26 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams
Why
,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Christian Crayton
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 7:26 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams
Why is there a need in ham radio
I strongly disagree. Your post is just another variant of everyone should
operate the way I do. While you are free to espouse this philosophy, we are
free to ignore it.
Hummm
Then you oppose using LEGACY mode users when talking about CW and SSB ham's ?
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, bruce mallon wa4...@... wrote:
I strongly disagree. Your post is just another variant of everyone should
operate the way I do. While you are free to espouse this philosophy, we are
free to ignore it.
Hummm
Then you oppose
Although I don't necessarily accept the idea that any of the modes,
digital or analog, can be considered inherently evil, my main concern is
whether they have value for various amateur interests.
Clearly, ragchewers, contesters, weak signal folks and all other niches
have their specific
The *only* ill will I've seen expressed is over the use of automatic stations
that transmit without first verifying that the frequency is in use. This has
nothing whatsoever to do with modes. It is unfortunate that one particular mode
(Pactor 3) is conflated with this style of operation, but as
What I would like to know is what negativity and misinformation was
even mentioned.
From now on lets be fair about making such statements by actually
quoting the alleged negative and misinformed statement so the rest of us
can make an informed decision whether such claims are even
15 matches
Mail list logo
