I believe that this was my comment...just for what I need to accomplish on
HF...I need the below capability. Which is not to assume that anyone else in
amateur radio or a customer of amateur radio services, other than me and the
folks I work with/support, would need such. Now you would get
Pop up a level, Walt. Forgetting about how it might be implemented,
what functionality do you seek?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Walt DuBose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that this was my comment...just for what I need to
accomplish on
HF...I need the
Before leaping to conclusions like a data transfer mode that would
be able to provide at a minimum between 4000 and 5000 characters per
minute throughput at SNRs or less than -5 dB, I strongly suggest
first reaching agreement on the use cases that such a protocol would
support.
The ARRL's
I'm still a bit confused by this whole process. Accepting that the
League's query wasn't an RFP, does anyone know with any certainty what
it IS? Is some sort of standard-setting envisioned here? Or
something else?
- Art
KD6O
