RE: [digitalradio] Re: Humans as Busy Detectors

2007-09-18 Thread Peter G. Viscarola
I hold QSOs every weekend. Its been months since I was last QRM'd by another operator. Really? Then either your luck, your operating practices, or your station must be MUCH different than mine. I get QRM'ed every week at least once. I'll be in QSO with a station and WHAM! Somebody starts to

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Humans as Busy Detectors

2007-09-18 Thread Dave AA6YQ
, 2007 10:08 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Humans as Busy Detectors I hold QSOs every weekend. Its been months since I was last QRM'd by another operator. Really? Then either your luck, your operating practices, or your station must be MUCH different than mine

[digitalradio] Re: Humans as Busy Detectors

2007-09-17 Thread Dave Bernstein
AA6YQ comments below --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, we should put this so-called busy-channel detection in perspective: Humans are very poor busy channel detectors... whether through human error, or through ignorance, or through

[digitalradio] Re: Humans as Busy Detectors

2007-09-16 Thread expeditionradio
First, we should put this so-called busy-channel detection in perspective: Humans are very poor busy channel detectors... whether through human error, or through ignorance, or through intention. Just try to hold a simple voice, CW, image, messaging, or texting QSO on one of the more active ham

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Humans as Busy Detectors

2007-09-16 Thread Howard Brown
Bonnie, do you mean 27.185 mHz? Howard K5hb - Original Message From: expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2007 7:18:32 PM Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Humans as Busy Detectors First, we should put