ered AMTOR MARSgrams received on the move and
printed with a thermal printer. The Model 100 still works.
"When all else fails."
Cheers,
Cortland
KA5S/AAR5UT
-Original Message-
>From: Rick W
>Sent: Mar 21, 2009 2:35 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>S
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Cortland Richmond
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 1:29 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: KV9U - MT63
In MARS nets I've noticed MT63 2000 Hz with long interleave delivering
surprisingly
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: KV9U - MT63
>
> Also the redundancy of the FEC treatment in MT-63 allows it to
> give 100% accuracy with 25% loss of data.
>
> In actual use, Olivia will do better under worse conditions at
speed before going to an ARQ
protocol.
David
KD4NUE
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Tony
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:41 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: KV9U - MT63
Rick
Rick,
> You have done the tests and found that MT-63 is not very good at
> handling weak signals compared with other modes.
It is less sensitive than others, but some of the most sensitive modes are not
necessarily the best performers when conditions deteriorate. I think it's
reasonably sensit