Re: [digitalradio] Re: KV9U - MT63

2009-03-21 Thread Cortland Richmond
ered AMTOR MARSgrams received on the move and printed with a thermal printer. The Model 100 still works. "When all else fails." Cheers, Cortland KA5S/AAR5UT -Original Message- >From: Rick W >Sent: Mar 21, 2009 2:35 PM >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >S

RE: [digitalradio] Re: KV9U - MT63

2009-03-21 Thread David Little
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Cortland Richmond Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 1:29 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: KV9U - MT63 In MARS nets I've noticed MT63 2000 Hz with long interleave delivering surprisingly

Re: [digitalradio] Re: KV9U - MT63

2009-03-21 Thread Rick W
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: KV9U - MT63 > > Also the redundancy of the FEC treatment in MT-63 allows it to > give 100% accuracy with 25% loss of data. > > In actual use, Olivia will do better under worse conditions at

RE: [digitalradio] Re: KV9U - MT63

2009-03-21 Thread David Little
speed before going to an ARQ protocol. David KD4NUE -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Tony Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:41 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] Re: KV9U - MT63 Rick

[digitalradio] Re: KV9U - MT63

2009-03-21 Thread Tony
Rick, > You have done the tests and found that MT-63 is not very good at > handling weak signals compared with other modes. It is less sensitive than others, but some of the most sensitive modes are not necessarily the best performers when conditions deteriorate. I think it's reasonably sensit