roups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Report of the ARRL Ad Hoc HF Digital Committee
Dissenting Recommendation
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 00:51:39 -
>>>AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "John Champa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Not the attorne
>>>AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "John Champa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Not the attorney, silly! I had to pay my attorney when I was
forced to take legal action against other Radio Amateurs, but
it was my unpaid volunteer efforts he was defending. Are we
in an a
continues to have my full support.
See ya on MT-63?
73,
John
K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: "Dave Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Report of the ARRL Ad Hoc HF Digital
ject: [digitalradio] Re: Report of the ARRL Ad Hoc HF Digital Committee
Dissenting Recommendation
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:22:11 -
1. The folks at Booth, Freret, Imlay & Tepper are unpaid volunteers?
2. One way to avoid such errors is to openly seeking broad review
beforehand; defe
1. The folks at Booth, Freret, Imlay & Tepper are unpaid volunteers?
2. One way to avoid such errors is to openly seeking broad review
beforehand; defects are less expensive (time, $) to correct sooner
than later.
The ARRL does a lot of things well, and deserve the appropriate
accolades. Howev
> The only other known use for voice-bandwidth data modes is for image
> transfers,
> which can send an SSTV-size picture, with a very
> low error rate, in 30 seconds, using a bandwidth of 2400 Hz.
> the same image, at the
> same low error rate, can be sent in less than 2 minutes, using a
> bandw
