Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Digital Voice

2007-05-13 Thread John Becker
Guys let's not start yet another rant on bandwidth. All Bonnie was pointing out was that there is no limit on DV at this time. I really don't think anyone would run anything wider that a SSB signal anyway. John, W0JAB Your (trying to be) friendly moderator

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Digital Voice

2007-05-13 Thread Danny Douglas
ard card. moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED] moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Digital Voice > Most hams want to do the right thing when it com

Re: [digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Digital Voice

2007-05-13 Thread mrfarm
Most hams want to do the right thing when it comes to operating on our very limited frequencies. That means keeping our signals as narrow as we possibly can to reduce interference to others. The FCC rules state that we should operate with good amateur practices and have also said that voice ban

[digitalradio] Re: WinDRM Digital Voice

2007-05-13 Thread expeditionradio
> Rick KV9U wrote: > This is one of the reasons that I do not expect DV to ever become > all that popular on HF. > ... since I doubt that there is any chance to have wider > bandwidth modes such as you have on VHF and up with over 6 kHz wide > signals. Hi Rick, In USA, there is currently