Re: [digitalradio] Starting a digital 30m traffic/ragchew net

2006-02-24 Thread KV9U
I like to think that we need to have a robust amateur radio network and I believe that many hams support the general concept, even if not particularly interested in participating. But one of the things we don't need is yet another real time network. By having semi-automatic server type systems,

Re: [digitalradio] Starting a digital 30m traffic/ragchew net

2006-02-24 Thread Andrew O'Brien
What do you think?  Would you be interested in being net control?  Ican't be net control every day, because I will be busy on some days, and I am already responsible for being net control of another net Istarted 3 evenings per week.It would be fun to see more activity on that band.  I'm not so

RE: [digitalradio] Starting a digital 30m traffic/ragchew net

2006-02-24 Thread DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
Title: RE: [digitalradio] Starting a digital 30m traffic/ragchew net Hooray for Jason...wonderful idea. I hope folks will get on and join Jason. 73, Walt/K5YFW -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalradio@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Jason Hsu

[digitalradio] Starting a digital 30m traffic/ragchew net

2006-02-23 Thread Jason Hsu
I'm thinking of starting a digital net on 30m. The purposes include jump-starting the 30m band and passing traffic. I'm surprised 30m is so empty, even when WWV is S9+ at 10 MHz. I thought that 30m spends more hours per day open than any other band. I think digital modes are a great way to