Re: [digitalradio] Yet another RTTY contest

2008-10-17 Thread Andrew O'Brien
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:05 AM, Steinar Aanesland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > dam if a frequency is occupied . > > 73 de LA5VNA Steinar > > Yes, that is sad but neither does W1AW when I am on 80M and the want to send CW bulletins.

Re: [digitalradio] Yet another RTTY contest

2008-10-17 Thread Steinar Aanesland
Well Andy, I am really glad 30m is contest free.In my experience, the contester don't give a dam if a frequency is occupied . 73 de LA5VNA Steinar Andrew O'Brien wrote: > I am aware that whenever there is a major RTTY contest, non-contesting > hams complain about the impact of the contest on

[digitalradio] Yet another RTTY contest

2008-10-16 Thread Andrew O'Brien
I am aware that whenever there is a major RTTY contest, non-contesting hams complain about the impact of the contest on the bands. This weekend is the JARTS RTTY contes, I took a look at the 2007 results ad discovered just over 700 total entrants. For a 48 hour contest, this does not seem like a nu

[digitalradio] Yet another RTTY contest this weekend

2005-02-25 Thread John Becker
North American QSO Party, RTTY: 1800Z, Feb 26 to 0600Z, Feb 27 Mode: RTTY Bands: 80, 40, 20, 15, 10m Classes: Single Op (QRP/Low) Multi-Two (Low) Max operating hours: Single Op: 10 hours Multi-Two: 12 hours Max power: LP: 100 watts