ot the
best place to gripe.
Flames automatically extinguished with the delete key.
73 Matt KI6NCU in Northern CA. KI6NCU-1 on 145.050
-Original Message-
From: John Simon [mailto:jrsi...@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 8:09 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [
vid Little"
To:
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 12:51 PM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams
>
> -Original Message-
> From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Christian Crayton
> Sent: Sunday, March
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Christian Crayton
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 9:05 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Brent Gourl
Your response above does not clarify your original post; if anything, it
increases the ambiguity
NO IT ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION .
Same old stuff its digital or the highway .
Have a nice day
Bruce
EVEN the arrl is calling us LEGACY modes .. the excuse is it is used in
industry for anolog modes.
Now It seems to me that if they want to matain members and digital; want to win
people over this is not going to help ..
--- On Sat, 3/7/09, Dave Bernstein wrote:
From: Dave Bernstein
Although I don't necessarily accept the idea that any of the modes,
digital or analog, can be considered inherently evil, my main concern is
whether they have value for various amateur interests.
Clearly, ragchewers, contesters, weak signal folks and all other niches
have their specific mode(s)
I strongly disagree. Your post is just another variant of "everyone should
operate the way I do". While you are free to espouse this philosophy, we are
free to ignore it.
Hummm
Then you oppose using LEGACY mode users when talking about CW and SSB ham's ?
re "WinLink 2000 and ALE are a cancer to amateur radio. They are evil
because they represent machines talking to machines, and we have too much of
that in this world already."
I strongly disagree. Your post is just another variant of "everyone should
operate the way I do". While you are free to es
But humans provided the emcom traffic to the machines, and the machines at
the far end of the communication deliver it to humans. Without the humans,
there is no "communication."
For genuine, this-is-no-drill emcom, we should use the most effective mode
possible. Effective being the balance bet
What I would like to know is what "negativity and misinformation" was
even mentioned.
From now on lets be fair about making such statements by actually
quoting the alleged negative and misinformed statement so the rest of us
can make an informed decision whether such claims are even appropriat
10 matches
Mail list logo
