Amen!!

 

Barry

AA7ZC

 


From: Steve Waterman, k4cjx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:28 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Emergency Communications: was Win Link

 


Imperial county (next door?) used it extensively accoring to the Red
Cross there.

This thread needs to end. It is going nowhere.


Steve, k4cjx



--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But did they use Winlink?  That was the gist of my original post.  
As an avid RTTY op for the past 23 years, I doubt very seriously RTTY
is used in local disasters.   Two meters or other VHF bands yes, but
digital, no.
>
> Buddy WB4M
> All outgoing emails scanned with Norton's Anti-virus.
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Dr. Howard S. White
>   To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:39 AM
>   Subject: [digitalradio] Emergency Communications: was Win Link
>
>
>   Buddy:
>
>
>   You don't have to go so far as India... How about something
closer to home... like San Diego
>
>    
>   The 2003 San Diego Cedar Fires
>               Most people are unaware that during the recent 2003
Cedar Fires which so devastated San Diego that Land Lines Telephones
failed due to downed wires, Cellular Systems failed due to
overloading, downed towers, failed links and signal refraction from
smoke and most seriously the 800 MHz trunked emergency radio network
which was used by all the fire fighters, police and other emergency
workers failed due to overloading and severe signal refraction from
the smoke.   In other words there was virtually no communications
whatsoever for several days.. EXCEPT....
>
>   The only group that was able to provide consistent reliable
communications was a group of 180+ volunteer amateur radio operators
operating under the auspices of ARES®, CERO, ARC, CDF and CARES.  
This, of course, is not surprising as in most civil emergencies, such
as 9/11; Amateur Radio Operators are usually the only ones that
continue to communicate reliably when all other means of
communications fail.
>
>   Why do government communications systems always fail in true
emergencies and our ham systems continue to work? The simple answer
is bio diversity.  We have many more frequencies, many more modes and
many more highly qualified trained operators than the government
does.   In the rush for funds, Congress sold off much of the
government emergency spectrum to the private sector.  This sale which
forced government emergency services into a single tiny band of
frequencies coupled with totally inadequate funding, leaves the
public totally unprotected every time a major emergency hits us.  
The government communications systems which work OK during normal
times, they just can't handle the volume or diversity of real
emergencies
>
>   So much for Ham Radio becoming a joke!
>
>   __________________________________________________________
>   Howard S. White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6  ex-AE6SM  KY6LA
>   "No Good Deed Goes Unpunished"
>   Formerly "Awfully Extremely Six Sado Masochist"
>   "Krazy Yankee Six Loves America"
>   Website: www.ky6la.com
>
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>     From: Steve Waterman, k4cjx
>     To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>     Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:21 PM
>     Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Win Link
>
>
>
>     Buddy,
>
>     Daily. We get requests from the U.S. Coast Guard every other
week or
>     so, as well as other country agencies, and we have a good track
>     record in finding these vessels.
>
>     During the last Hurricane episode, we were the only visible
>     communications from many of the islands, the most widely known
was
>     Grenada, but there were many more, including coastal areas
within th
>     USA.
>
>     During the Tsunami Disaster (still a disaster, still pumping
traffic)
>     offshore vessels out off the shallow coastal areas barely felt
>     the "bump," however, they were able to get to shore and assist
where
>     feasible. They still are assisting.
>
>     The recent failure of INTELSAT 804, which was a major pipeline
for
>     several New Zealand Common Carriers, the Military, and
Broadcast
>     Stations, failed permanently. High revenue users were placed on
other
>     satellites, but very many islands were left without
communications.
>     We were able to provide communications for many of those
without it.
>     We still do.
>
>     In fact, a PMBO is being set up in India along with the PMBO in
>     Darwin, Australia specifically to assist with these last two
>     unfortunate incidents.
>
>     There is other not so public assistance coming out of other
parts of
>     the World, and they are still in operation. Best I can give you
there
>     is to review the CBS documentary of past efforts in that part
of the
>     world with a video called "Last Voice From Kuwait" I think
still at
>     the ARRL, although I am not certain if they have copies.
>
>     There is a more, such as the horror show weather in Puru and
Chili
>     immediately after the hurricanes last year, but hopefully, you
get
>     the picture.
>
>
>     Steve, k4cjx
>
>
>     --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>     > Great overall post, Dean!  Especially this part:
>     >
>     > >
>     > >   1. Ham radio is dying, because modern communications
technology
>     has
>     > >      passed it, and the amateur community, even if totally
united
>     (ha
>     > >      ha), doesn't have the resources to combat it in any
>     meaningful way.
>     > >   2. The attempt to justify amateur radio by its role in
providing
>     > >      emergency and public service communications is rapidly
>     becoming a
>     > >      joke.
>     >
>     > Can someone tell me the last time there was an emergency that
wiped
>     out
>     > "normal" communications, and a bunch of hams got on Winlink
and
>     saved the
>     > day?   When a severe emergency happens, like a tornado,
hurricane,
>     or
>     > nuclear war,  I think most people are mainly concerned with
saving
>     their
>     > bacon, and not getting on the air.
>     >
>     > 73 Buddy WB4M
>
>
>
>
>
>     The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT
telnet://208.15.25.196/
>
>
>
>
>     The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT
telnet://208.15.25.196/
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
>     Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>       a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
>       http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
>        
>       b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>        
>       c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of Service.





The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/





The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to