- Original Message -
From: "Sholto Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: FCC: "Petition to Kill Digital Advancement"
>I probably should not get involved but here's a classic example
Hello Sholto
Sad to say , but I have had the same experience many times.
73 de LA5VNA Steinar
Sholto Fisher skrev:
>
> I probably should not get involved but here's a classic example of why
> feelings against Pactor 3 run so high.
>
> The frequency is 10.140, the mode is PSK31, it is 19:39 UTC
Were you able to get an ID from the P3 station?
Leigh/WA5ZNU
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:53 am, Sholto KE7HPV wrote:
> us. But then the transmission changes straight to Pactor-3 and wipes
> everyone out for at least 5 minutes.
I probably should not get involved but here's a classic example of why
feelings against Pactor 3 run so high.
The frequency is 10.140, the mode is PSK31, it is 19:39 UTC today (29th Dec)
and VE1CDD is in QSO with PJ2MI, N0MNO and KJ7A are on frequency and I am
calling CQ. A Pactor-1 call up can be
Demetre,
It might help to visualize the interference problem caused by unattended
PMBO stations like this analogy:
"A Winlink client, triggering a WinlinkPMBO to transmit, is like remotely
triggering a bomb blast without any way to guarantee that the area around
the bomb is clear."
Winlink 20
On Thursday 27 December 2007 01:34:56 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If folks would utilize the time they spend complaining learning to be
> better operators,
Interpretation: Learn to get out of the way of automated stations when they
come on frequency without checking to see if the frequency is
Yes I did.
No matter what happens if you read starting at line 4
of page 11 of the PDF file you can see that this is no more
then more damn noise from the anti-wide people.
And I'll say it again here that under FCC rules there is no such
thing as a "unattended station" what there is (for the clue
"But, it won't happen; the FCC Will take spectrum
back, long before we ever evolve to the point of
becoming better operators and having constructive
discussion for the common good."
Ham radio an't broke if the digicrats would wake up
and smell the interferance coffie and work to be just
another mo
We won't have to "give" the bands back; we won't have that option here in
the US. A few more Petitions, more tradition fueled Proposed Rulemaking
Laments from the ARRL and the continued bickering of folks who have the sole
purpose in life of stoking their own ego.And the FCC will relieve us of
Anyone notice that the vast majority of the negative comments about the
petition are (nearly) identical. Sort of reminds me of the "Send the
following letter to your Congressman!" like the NUMBERS count and not
the content.
I sure wish that petitioners -- both pro and con -- would think for
themse
your comment
"There have always been naysayers to innovation in Ham
Radio. I started many decades ago when everyone was on
AM, and SSB was just getting started. The AMers called
it "Silly Side Band" and many
claimed "They ought to outlaw those guys who sound
like ducks".
answer .
I canno
11 matches
Mail list logo
