RE: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

] Behalf Of "John Becker, WOJAB" Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 11:20 AM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M Right. and for the newer no code hams this will help how? At 04:18 PM 1/6/2008, you wrote: >IDing in CW has the benefits that it

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Right. and for the newer no code hams this will help how? At 04:18 PM 1/6/2008, you wrote: >IDing in CW has the benefits that its universally understood, requires no >decoding software, and is trivial to implement. > >73, > >Dave, AA6YQ >

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Yes, Skip. My bad. You are correct except for the "." at the end of the link Sorry for the qrm... that is little QRM, like psk31 is 73 Chuck AA5J > > > > At 01:02 PM 1/6/2008, Nick wrote: > > > >>Hello Haward, > >> > >>Happy New Year! > >> > >>Sorry, > <http://www.

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Should be http://www.w1hkj.com/NBEMS. The k and h were transposed. Skip KH6TY - Original Message - From: "Chuck Mayfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 6:38 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M > Try: http://www.w1khj.com/N

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Try: http://www.w1khj.com/NBEMS CHUCK AA5J At 01:02 PM 1/6/2008, Nick wrote: >Hello Haward, > >Happy New Year! > >Sorry, http://www.w1khj/NBEMS is not a working link. > >"Server not found >Firefox can't find the server at www.w1khj.com " > >73! > >Sunday, January 06, 200

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

, January 06, 2008 5:28 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M At 08:18 AM 1/7/2008, you wrote: IDing in CW has the benefits that its universally understood, requires no decoding software, and is trivial to implement. 73, Dave,

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Hi Jackboth multipsk and fldigi have a feature where you can monitor your transmit signal..one way to learn what they look like is to turn the feature on and the try transmitting the various modes and learn to see what they look like. there is more than one way of killing the cat as

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

At 08:33 AM 1/7/2008, you wrote: >Hi Dave CW id is not universally understood..i for one have >a hearing problem and CW is very difficult for me to hear let alone >decode...also what about those who are deaf...we do have a number of >them around the world... most are now using digital

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

*Sent:* Sunday, January 06, 2008 3:28 PM *To:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com *Subject:* Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M At 04:57 AM 1/7/2008, Rick wrote: >I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than >exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. > &g

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

At 08:18 AM 1/7/2008, you wrote: IDing in CW has the benefits that its universally understood, requires no decoding software, and is trivial to implement. 73, Dave, AA6YQ OK, ask ALL software developers to bury that function in their program.so it can't be switched OFF and

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

:28 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M At 04:57 AM 1/7/2008, Rick wrote: >I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than >exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. > >Just a few minutes ago I was tryi

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Jack Chomley wrote: At 04:57 AM 1/7/2008, Rick wrote: >I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than >exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. > >Just a few minutes ago I was trying to have a Q with VE5MU using FAE 400 >around 10137. A Pactor station sta

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

At 04:57 AM 1/7/2008, Rick wrote: >I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than >exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. > >Just a few minutes ago I was trying to have a Q with VE5MU using FAE 400 >around 10137. A Pactor station starting transmitting righ

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Rick wrote: > > I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than > exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. > > Just a few minutes ago I was trying to have a Q with VE5MU using FAE > 400 around 10137. A Pactor station starting transmitting right over > our

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

tor-3 and cover everyone up. I find it hard to believe that the initiating station couldn't hear at least one of the PSK31 signals. 73 Sholto KE7HPV. - Original Message - From: "Rick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 10:57 AM Subject: Re: [di

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

I sure wish more hams would work on solving this problem, rather than exacerbating the situation and being part of the problem. Just a few minutes ago I was trying to have a Q with VE5MU using FAE 400 around 10137. A Pactor station starting transmitting right over our frequency. It is really u

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

is in Trinidad according to ZS5S. No thanks for the sarcasm. Maybe you can help if you are so inclined...Would you like to? Skip - Original Message - From: "Andreas Rehberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 1:05 PM Subject: Re: [digitalrad

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Pactor on 30 M

Skip, you don't really mean that! Any witches to burn.. thieves to cut the hands off.. I'll go now and monitor the bands.. woe betide I find a NBEMS signal that interferes another signal.. Andy, DF4WC Original-Nachricht > Datum: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:50:52 -0500 > Von: "kh6ty" <