Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

Dave wrote: > > > Spread spectrum has no bandwidth definition, it is a transmission > technique plain and simple. This is a nuance, but an important technical one: There is a "spreading ratio" definition in SS that is one of the formal identifiers of spread spectrum vs other modulation technique

RE: [digitalradio] Re: ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

Without intending to reopen the argument about spread spectrum, the FCC has spoken about the legality of the mode. A few US hams will argue that it isn't spread spectrum since it isn't any wider than a SSB channel. Spread spectrum has no bandwidth definition, it is a transmission technique plain a

RE: [digitalradio] Re: ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

Exactly, Skip. Well put. Dave Real radio bounces off the sky _ From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of KH6TY Sent: Wednesday, 02 June, 2010 17:38 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

I agree with Rein's concern. Given the actions of the author in the past, and the fact that he is not even part of the amateur radio community, I'd be very hesitant to use that mode in a program, not know knowing what other malicious code might be embedded in the ROS software. Except for the

RE: [digitalradio] Re: ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP

Rein, There are several (around a dozen I think) amateur operators that are "prohibited" from using ROS by having their call signs hard-coded into a persona-non-grata listing in ROS. I am proud to be one of those ops. This has been extensively documented on QRZ in the following thread: