On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:01 PM Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:28:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 07:37:13PM +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> > > Apparently #x86-32 as comment is breaking dim on the fixes flow.
> > >
> > >
> > > $ tdim push drm-intel-
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:28:21PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 07:37:13PM +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> > Apparently #x86-32 as comment is breaking dim on the fixes flow.
> >
> >
> > $ tdim push drm-intel-next-fixes
> > dim: d6ec212e4a0d ("drm/i915/gem: Avoid implicit vm
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 07:37:13PM +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> Apparently #x86-32 as comment is breaking dim on the fixes flow.
>
>
> $ tdim push drm-intel-next-fixes
> dim: d6ec212e4a0d ("drm/i915/gem: Avoid implicit vmap for highmem on
> x86-32"): Subject in fixes line doesn't match referenc
Apparently #x86-32 as comment is breaking dim on the fixes flow.
$ tdim push drm-intel-next-fixes
dim: d6ec212e4a0d ("drm/i915/gem: Avoid implicit vmap for highmem on x86-32"):
Subject in fixes line doesn't match referenced commit:
dim: fb8621d3bee8 ("drm/i915: Avoid allocating a vmap arena
