Re: [PULL] drm-xe-next

2024-02-26 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:46:43AM +, Daniel Stone wrote: Hi, On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 03:21, Lucas De Marchi wrote: All of this should be fixed by now: dim is used for applying and pushing patches, which has additional checks so that doesn't happen again. Still pending confirmation from

Re: [PULL] drm-xe-next

2024-02-26 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 03:21, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > All of this should be fixed by now: dim is used for applying and pushing > patches, which has additional checks so that doesn't happen again. Still > pending confirmation from Daniel Stone if the git server hooks are ready > in gitlab so

Re: [PULL] drm-xe-next

2024-02-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 09:21:00PM -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > Hi Dave and Sima, > > Here's the PR for drm-xe-next for Linux v6.9. It's a big list of > changes, but it contains several fixes for things noticed throughout the > v6.8 cycle after being merged upstream, added to the linux-next,

Re: [PULL] drm-misc-next

2024-02-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:58:41PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi Dave, Sima, > > this is the weekly PR for drm-misc-next. It's the usual set of > fixes and driver updates. Statistics computation for shared GEM BOs > has been updated to take imported DMA bufs into account. This can > result