Re: [Discuss] (ot) Android

2014-05-22 Thread Peter (peabo) Olson
You mean the $40 A700 (??) ... I bought one, so I am interested. peabo On May 22, 2014 at 10:54 AM Bill Ricker wrote: > Who wanted the notes for upgrading MicroCenter loss-leader Android? > > -- > Bill Ricker > bill.n1...@gmail.com > https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux > __

Re: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-22 Thread Richard Pieri
Derek Martin wrote: > 2. Suck it up. See above. This. "We" don't know where I want to send my correspondence. Period. -- Rich P. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-22 Thread Richard Pieri
Derek Martin wrote: > I admit I'd forgotten this; for the longest time I had a patch which I > wrote to fix this applied to my mutt; Mutt dev being what it is > (basically dead) the maintainers didn't have any interest in applying > it. I have no use to maintain patches forever so I stopped bother

Re: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-22 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 08:20:07AM -0400, Robert Krawitz wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2014 14:06:33 -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:30:43PM -0400, Robert Krawitz wrote: > >> (Don't simply say that it's a bad policy... > > > > But it IS a bad policy. It is not the place of th

Re: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-22 Thread Derek Martin
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:05:12PM -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 06:55:13PM -0400, Richard Pieri wrote: > > With the caveat that I did not list Mutt by name but that's quibbling. > > Point is, as you've experienced yourself, Mutt's behavior is not > > consistent when improper

Re: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-22 Thread Derek Martin
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 06:55:13PM -0400, Richard Pieri wrote: > With the caveat that I did not list Mutt by name but that's quibbling. > Point is, as you've experienced yourself, Mutt's behavior is not > consistent when improperly-set Reply-To fields are in play. I admit I'd forgotten this; for t

Re: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-22 Thread Richard Pieri
Derek Atkins wrote: > I'd love to see this code ;) I haven't been able to find my hack. I think I know where it is but the zip file is damaged. -- Rich P. ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[Discuss] (ot) Android

2014-05-22 Thread Bill Ricker
Who wanted the notes for upgrading MicroCenter loss-leader Android? -- Bill Ricker bill.n1...@gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-22 Thread Derek Atkins
Richard Pieri writes: > Richard Pieri wrote: >> You are incorrect. When the Reply-To field is set then all replies use >> the Reply-To field contents for the new To field. This is unexpected >> when reply to list would otherwise use the list's address. This is >> unexpected when reply to all woul

Re: [Discuss] DMARC issue, Yahoo and beyond

2014-05-22 Thread Robert Krawitz
On Wed, 21 May 2014 14:06:33 -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:30:43PM -0400, Robert Krawitz wrote: >> > Lists setting or rewriting Reply-To headers punishes users of >> > good, open source mail programs and rewards users of broken, >> > proprietary mail programs like Outlook.

Re: [Discuss] [OT] Android development books

2014-05-22 Thread Jerry Feldman
A recommendation for some good Android development books. On 05/22/2014 12:01 AM, John Abreau wrote: > Is there supposed to be a question there, or is that a response to > someone else's question? > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Jerry Feldman > wrote: > > I have a