On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Bill Bogstad bogs...@pobox.com wrote:
[slow ntfs-3g filesystem performance]
Use FAT32 to share. Or, if you use Windows infrequently, use a Windows ext4
driver.
FAT32 has a 2TB filesystem limit. THE USB drive in question is 4TB.
NTFS-3G is recommended mount
I have Comcast Business in three locations. The service is extremely
reliable. I don't think I've ever had the circuit go down in three years
at our Watertown location. Our Weston location has more outages due to
trees falling on the lines.
I've dealt with tech support less than a handful of
Are any of those three locations a residential location, or are they all
located in office buildings?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Chris P. OConnell omegah...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have Comcast Business in three locations. The service is extremely
reliable. I don't think I've ever had the
One is an office building in Watertown. The other (in Weston) is a mixed
use building, half retirement home half business office. The building in
Weston has two Comcast lines, one for the residents and one for the
business office. Both lines are business accounts. Generally at this
building
Hello all,
When I used usb flash drive image and ran the kickstart, it installed on usb
flash drive instead of hard drive. The kickstart ran fine from the DVD drive.
What should I do to avoid install to the USB drive?
Thanks,
MK
___
Discuss
On 7/23/2014 11:40 AM, Dave Peters wrote:
What should I do to avoid install to the USB drive?
Change your kickstart to use the correct target device. For example: sdb
instead of sda.
--
Rich P.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
Guys,
I'm back in my obession mode, this time I'm putting my basement
computers into a standard 19 rack. So any recommendations on rack
mountable chassis? I have to mid tower systems and the plan is to take
the components out of the mid tower chassis and assemble them into two
rack mountable
Hi Bill,
Interesting problem. I wonder if the severe write performance cut has
something to do with using the NTFS drivers and USB. Have you done write
tests with internal hardware or even loop-back deceives?
I found this report for tests over sata where they got (15MB/s) - still
terrible but
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/rackmount-cases-stands-furniture?isSuggestion
=true
-Original Message-
From: discuss-bounces+joe=polcari@blu.org
[mailto:discuss-bounces+joe=polcari@blu.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Adler
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 12:36 PM
To: discuss@blu.org
On 7/23/2014 1:18 PM, John Hall wrote:
I wonder... What sort of write performance folks get from NTFS drives
attached to a gigabit router?
Has anyone ever successfully connected a disk drive to router?
But seriously, I typically get 70-80MB/s between nodes over GigE with
1500 byte frames.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:18 PM, John Hall johnhall...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bill,
Interesting problem. I wonder if the severe write performance cut has
something to do with using the NTFS drivers and USB. Have you done write
tests with internal hardware or even loop-back deceives?
The
[It seems like I'm on a roll of odd low level hardware/software
questions recently.]
I've been getting messages in the system log for several years now
like the one in the
subject line. A new one is typically logged every 1000-4000 seconds.
The device
in question is a USB multi-card reader on
On 7/23/2014 2:02 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
The problem seems to be 100% bad filesystem software.
No, it's FUSE.
FUSE runs in user space. Disk I/O happens in kernel space. This means
that read and write operations require much context switching. The
overhead for this is very high.
--
Rich P.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Richard Pieri richard.pi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/23/2014 2:02 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
The problem seems to be 100% bad filesystem software.
No, it's FUSE.
FUSE runs in user space. Disk I/O happens in kernel space. This means
that read and write operations
On 7/23/2014 3:47 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
That certainly sounds plausible. But when I look for benchmarks for
other FUSE based filesystems I see better numbers.
NTFS performance comes from caching. FUSE doesn't do caching well. Other
FUSE file systems that aren't as cache-intensive will
When we, the consumers band together and demand that our isp's not slow
down our, the customer's, net activity and/or change isp's and say why
we're leaving. They listen to money. Otherwise they don't care.
I'm curious though. If you vpn from work, why doesn't the content stream
get crippled
No.
-Original Message-
From: discuss-bounces+joe=polcari@blu.org
[mailto:discuss-bounces+joe=polcari@blu.org] On Behalf Of Stuart Conner
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 4:59 PM
To: discuss@blu.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Https - the solution to net neutrality
When we, the consumers
On 7/23/2014 4:39 PM, Richard Pieri wrote:
NTFS performance comes from caching.
I should amend that: NTFS performance comes in part from caching.
--
Rich P.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Jul 23, 2014 4:58 PM, Stuart Conner genuineau...@gmail.com wrote:
When we, the consumers band together and demand that our isp's not slow
down our, the customer's, net activity and/or change isp's and say why
we're leaving. They listen to money. Otherwise they don't care.
You forget that
From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of Stuart Conner
When we, the consumers band together and demand that our isp's not slow
down our, the customer's, net activity and/or change isp's and say why
we're leaving. They
Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote:
I can't demand anything. As I described in another post, they ripped
out half of my TV channels in the middle of a 2yr contract, told me
if I cancel my service I'll be hit with a $425 early termination fee,
argued with me pointlessly for hours, and eventually I
21 matches
Mail list logo
