On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu)
wrote:
>> From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
>> bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of Tom Metro
>>
>> This could be avoided with architectural changes. Specifically using
>> inotify[1] on Linux to moni
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
> On 7/30/2014 8:08 PM, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Richard Pieri
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/28/2014 9:00 PM, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
All interfaces connected to the Ethernet or two wireless networks end up
>>>
On 7/30/2014 8:08 PM, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Richard Pieri
> wrote:
>
>> On 7/28/2014 9:00 PM, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
>>> All interfaces connected to the Ethernet or two wireless networks end up
>>> on the same subnet (192.168.0.x).
>> I'm figuring you don't ha
On 7/30/2014 5:57 PM, Tom Metro wrote:
> This could be avoided with architectural changes. Specifically using
> inotify[1] on Linux to monitor a file system. (See also fsnotify[2].) A
This fails to account for changes made while the tool is not running. If
you want to detect such changes then the
> From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
> bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of Tom Metro
>
> This could be avoided with architectural changes. Specifically using
> inotify[1] on Linux to monitor a file system. (See also fsnotify[2].) A
This is a partial truth
Richard Pieri wrote:
>> *BTSync*
>
> The in-memory databases peaked for me at around 500MB. They've made
> improvements for directories with lots of small files but there's a
> limit to how much optimization can be done. Note that this isn't a
> problem unique to BTSync; anything using in-memory d
Richard Pieri wrote:
>> At this point in time I've mostly given up on automated sync systems.
>> Too many little problems for me to deal with.
Ditto. There's just not a lot of investment in creating home-user software
like that; unison's still the best out there (but you have to monitor things
r
On 7/30/2014 12:03 PM, John Hall wrote:
> How elaborate are your custom scripts for unison? I assume it just
> requires rsync and unison on the server?
It's just a simple for loop:
for s in ~/.unison/*.prf; do
unison -auto -batch -terse $s
done
Initiated manually from desktop icons. SSH is use
Who here wants something anyway? I'm kind of lost in this thread, as different
people are apparently looking for to solve different requirements -
If what you want is something that does a good job syncing your personal
devices without need for a server, and it doesn't need to be "live" sync,
For my personal & professional use I get by using Google Drive, or DropBox
to sync things like PDFs that require no security to my iPad, or Android
phone.
For everything else I use version control, scp or rsync+ssh as needed.
Still it would be really nice to have a secure private, automatic sync.
On 7/30/2014 11:17 AM, Matt Shields wrote:
> It's dropbox replacement.
I'm sorry. Requiring a dedicated server with a full LAMP stack isn't a
Dropbox replacement. It's some kind of enterprise bloatware.
--
Rich P.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.o
It's dropbox replacement. Gives you a GUI for management of your or your
companies files. Also gives you a GUI file editor and you can create apps
that live on top of the system, like a calendar service. Obviously it's
larger than what some people are looking for.
Matt
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at
On 7/30/2014 8:06 AM, Matt Shields wrote:
> Did you try ownCloud?
Yes. It's horrible. I mean, BTSync and Syncthing are single executables.
Start the daemon and you're syncing files. Bang, done. ownCloud requires
a full LAMP stack on a dedicated server and the associated
administrative overhead.
I
Ed,
It looks great (at least from the website) but it's not free.
What were the issues with ownCloud?
Matt
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu) wrote:
> > From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
> > bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of
> From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
> bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of Matt Shields
>
> Did you try ownCloud? It's a self-hosted replacement for Dropbox. They
> even have some built in apps, so I can use the web interface when I don't
> have my compu
Did you try ownCloud? It's a self-hosted replacement for Dropbox. They
even have some built in apps, so I can use the web interface when I don't
have my computer or phone to log in and edit documents similar to Google
Apps.
Matt
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Richard Pieri
wrote:
> At this
16 matches
Mail list logo
