Re: [Discuss] os x = poop?

2015-02-14 Thread Bill Bogstad
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Richard Pieri wrote: > On 2/12/2015 4:16 PM, Martin Owens wrote: >> >> No, that's what the general public does. Apple is anti-foss, not just >> neutral to FOSS when you tot up their track record. > > > https://www.apple.com/opensource/ > http://www.opensource.apple

Re: [Discuss] Event Timestamps

2015-02-14 Thread Jerry Feldman
On 02/12/2015 10:41 AM, Mike Small wrote: > Kent Borg writes: >> store with the event (Python makes is to easy to put it in an >> attribute), yet they don't capture something so basic. They do an >> event queue, but don't tell me when the events happened. It is one >> thing to not tell me about a

Re: [Discuss] os x = poop?

2015-02-14 Thread Jerry Feldman
On 02/11/2015 10:49 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: > On 2/11/2015 10:27 PM, Dr. Anthony Gabrielson wrote: >> a MB Air - the battery life is similar between OS X and Linux, which >> is really impressive. > > Not really. About half of that is not shipping a Flash player with > Safari. Apple measured an av

Re: [Discuss] os x = poop?

2015-02-14 Thread Eric Chadbourne
"OS X gets the work done with minimum fuss and management/updating overhead.” Compared to what? Certainly not gnu/linux or BSD. Many examples have already been sited such as package management. The above sounds like something out a marketing pamphlet. — Eric Chadbourne _