On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Rich Pieri wrote:
> On 10/1/2015 11:01 PM, Shirley Márquez Dúlcey wrote:
>>
>> This story is far from nothing. The FCC could enact rules that would
>> lock out the ability to load alternative firmware in a router - say,
>
>
> blah-blah-blah.
>
> The FCC could have
On 10/5/2015 3:20 AM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
So what does it mean when the FCC's own documents suggest otherwise?
For example, the document at:
What it means is that you are taking one document to be something it isn't.
FCC guidelines are not rules. They are not requirements. They are not
even r
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Rich Pieri wrote:
> On 10/5/2015 3:20 AM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
>>
>> So what does it mean when the FCC's own documents suggest otherwise?
>> For example, the document at:
>
>
> What it means is that you are taking one document to be something it isn't.
>
> FCC guide
> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On
> Behalf Of Shirley Márquez Dúlcey
>
> A router locked down in that way could not incorporate any GPLv3 code.
I don't see any reason locked-down firmware would violate GPLv3. As long as you
announce what code you're using, and
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu)
wrote:
>> From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On
>> Behalf Of Shirley Márquez Dúlcey
>>
>> A router locked down in that way could not incorporate any GPLv3 code.
>
> I don't see any reason locked-down firmware wou
On 10/5/2015 12:50 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
Vendors will take the path of least resistance. Tivo and others have
already shown how to only allow signed firmware updates. Vendors
Vendors will do what they think will generate the most revenue for the
least total cost. The ones which have been
opencompute.org/blog/registration-now-open.ocp-engineering-workshop-fidelity-october-9-2015/
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Fwded from Dave Taht... apologies if I am wading into the thread late...
--
Signatures for the cerowrt letter to the fcc on the wifi lockdown issue are
being collected at: http://goo.gl/forms/WCF7kPcFl9
I would love it if you could sign. (and reshare with other
Unfortunately, Torvalds despises GPLv3, so the Linux kernel and anything
else he has copyright on will stay with GPLv2.
Mark Rosenthal
On 10/5/15 1:33 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (blu)
wrote:
From: Discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces+blu=nedharve
On 10/5/2015 3:26 PM, MBR wrote:
Unfortunately, Torvalds despises GPLv3, so the Linux kernel and anything
else he has copyright on will stay with GPLv2.
Access point vendors have been supporting Linux since the WRT54G, albeit
most of them doing so unofficially so that they aren't bombarded wit
10 matches
Mail list logo
