On 4/3/2016 2:49 AM, Rich Pieri wrote:
> On 4/2/2016 10:20 PM, Matthew Gillen wrote:
>> That would satisfy the anti-tivoization and be within the limits of the
>> GPLv3, while still causing a problem for the FBI in this particular
>> instance.
>
> Incorrect on both counts. Part 6 prohibits restric
On 4/3/2016 7:58 AM, Matthew Gillen wrote:
> That is quite debatable. Auto-bricking the phone would definitely count
> as interfering with the device. Erasing protected storage that does not
> render the device unusable (even if, for instance, it made it so you
> could never talk to iTunes again)
Morning update:
I found another mail program for my phone that works. I'm hoping I can
get the default app to work eventually though. I also got my wife's
iPhone working. Incoming mail is still going to my home server, which
is fine for now, and outgoing is relaying through the linode box.
Can someone point me to a good explanation of this? I've found some
that look understandable, but my rule still doesn't work.
My problem is that I rewrote a wordpress site into drupal, and I would
like old links to some pages on the old wordpress site to translate to the
equivalent page on the n
Clear your browser cache?
--
Rich P.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Rich Pieri wrote:
> Clear your browser cache?
Aye. That or using a new, Private mode window.
Much testing how things appear to the rest of the world benefits from
Private mode ... including googling (avoiding their predictive
feedback bubble effect; duck duck go h
Laura,
A few thoughts. You may need to have loaded mod rewrite in your main apache
server configuration. Look up mod rewrite.
I would put this in the virtual server configuration not in an htaccess
file.
Unless it's required to propagate the ability to set server directives to
authorized users or h
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Rich Pieri wrote:
> On 4/2/2016 8:48 AM, IngeGNUe wrote:
> > That strikes me as weird because /etc/fstab has been around forever. Is
> > this just FUD, is Apple prone to FUD? Or...have they broken
> > compatibility with such things as you would see in GNU and BSD?
On 4/3/2016 4:43 PM, John Hall wrote:
> ​But it seems that such edits would have to be more unlucky than simply
> careless. I suppose the automounter needs it's context directory...and no
> collisions, but I'm not following how *adding* an NTFS volume as read/write
> instead of read only would a
