(Bill Bogstad) commented:
> this is for the people who are on the cheap $8 a month
> Limited Basic plan. Think retiree on a fixed income who
> just wants to keep watching the broadcast channels they
> always have and doesn't want any new fangled gadgets.
The $8/mo service is appealing to more tha
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 05:53:30PM -0400, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
> The recent thread regarding RCN, reminded me of the AT&T BB installation
> 10 years ago. They installed an additional splitter (two-way) with one
> cable going into the cable modem and the other cable going into another
> From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
> bounces+blu=nedharvey@blu.org] On Behalf Of Matt Shields
>
> > With the technological advances made since then, is this extra two-way
> > splitter still required today, or could everything now go into one
splitter?
>
> No be
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Matt Shields wrote:
> No because comcast no longer supports analog cable. All TV's in your house
> must either have a digital cable box, a digital dvr box or an analog to
> digital convertor or you won't get any channels. I believe they started
> this about a yea
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 5:53 PM, wrote:
> The recent thread regarding RCN, reminded me of the AT&T BB installation 10
> years ago. They installed an additional splitter (two-way) with one cable
> going into the cable modem and the other cable going into another splitter
> (three-way) going to the
The recent thread regarding RCN, reminded me of the AT&T BB installation
10 years ago. They installed an additional splitter (two-way) with one
cable going into the cable modem and the other cable going into another
splitter (three-way) going to the TV's. At the time of the
installation, they
