Re: [Discuss] streaming webcam

2012-04-24 Thread Jerry Natowitz
only care that the pixels get delivered on time and in order :-) I suspect the security cameras may be a good choice. Jerry Original message >Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:51:10 -0400 >From: discuss-bounces+j.natowitz=rcn@blu.org (on behalf of Mark Woodward >) >Subject: R

Re: [Discuss] streaming webcam

2012-04-24 Thread Mark Woodward
On 04/24/2012 08:08 AM, John Abreau wrote: A decent camcorder can record video with a framerate of 60 fps. A typical webcam may record at something like 12 fps or less. Unfortunately, the application calls for a webcam, or at least a USB video camera. On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Mark Woo

Re: [Discuss] streaming webcam

2012-04-24 Thread Mark Woodward
Also, I have a bunch of webcams, and the one main problem I see in them is that they are SLOW. With very little motion, they seem OK, but if you move them quickly they blur the image terribly. It is important that the effective "shutter speed" is quick enough that moderate motion of the camera

[Discuss] streaming webcam

2012-04-24 Thread Mark Woodward
I am looking for a very low latency simple webcam program. I want to be able to see the video from my laptop on my android fairly snappy. Most of the things I've seen introduce about 1/2 to a full second latency. So when I move my hand, I see the delay. I want to get rid of that I need it to be