That setting already was set to true, but it made no difference.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Gillen
To: discuss@blu.org
Sent: Mon, Feb 21, 2011 1:00 pm
Subject: Re: Diagnosing connection issue
On 02/21/2011 12:47 PM, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
> The issue has been resolved by
On 02/21/2011 12:47 PM, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
> The issue has been resolved by not using Mozilla-derived software on
> both operating systems.
A little late now, but someone earlier pointed out that IPv6 DNS can
cause issues because of incomplete support for it.
With mozilla-based product
The issue has been resolved by not using Mozilla-derived software on
both operating systems.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:56:35AM -0500, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
>
>
> ___
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@blu.org
> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
What's that old joke about the definition of insanity? Doing the same
thing ov
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This mobile interface... :( It was through using the current
version of Firefox supplied by Ubuntu and SeaMonkey ver. 2.0.11 as wel
as a release candidate of 2.0.12 in Linux, and SM 2.0.11 with Fx
3.6.13 in Win Vista.
___
Discuss mailing list
D
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On 02/16/2011 07:37 PM, Tom Metro wrote:
> edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
>> What remains a mystery...I could not call up the modem
>> and router status screens in the browsers using their IP addresses
>> (no DNS used), yet both of them sent back immediate ping responses...
> While unlikely, especial
I am becoming convinced that the problem is /not/ the modem, router, NIC, or
cables, but possibly an issue affecting both SeaMonkey and Firefox which is not
dependent on any particular operating system.
I installed Chromium and have been using it for a good 20 minutes now, no
connection issues
Bill Bogstad wrote:
>
> Some more ideas:
>
> 1. Maybe pings work because they are small packets. Maybe something
> is flaky in handling full size packets. Try specifying packet sizes
> to ping (ping -s).
> 2. Check stats on your network card with "ifconfig" to look for
> errored or dropped packe
Tom Metro wrote:
> edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
>> What remains a mystery...I could not call up the modem
>> and router status screens in the browsers using their IP addresses
>> (no DNS used), yet both of them sent back immediate ping responses...
> While unlikely, especially with two appliances i
edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
> What remains a mystery...I could not call up the modem
> and router status screens in the browsers using their IP addresses
> (no DNS used), yet both of them sent back immediate ping responses...
While unlikely, especially with two appliances involved, it is possible
edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
> Bill Bogstad wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:22 AM, wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have not as yet tried a traceroute when this occurs, but will do so the
>>> next time. I have not experienced this same issue on my laptop using a
>>> wireless connection.
>>>
Bill Bogstad wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:22 AM, wrote:
>
>> I have not as yet tried a traceroute when this occurs, but will do so the
>> next time. I have not experienced this same issue on my laptop using a
>> wireless connection.
>>
>> But even when this occurs, /if/ the problem i
..@blu.org>
To: discuss@blu.org
Sent: Wed, Feb 16, 2011 9:28 am
Subject: Re: Diagnosing connection issue
On 02/15/2011 03:53 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:55 AM, <edwa...@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>> This happens with both Linux and Windows, so it canno
.
On the Linux side, the item in the config files relating to IPv6 DNS lookups
for both Firefox and SeaMonkey, is set to true - IPv6 DNS lookups are disabled.
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Feldman
To: discuss@blu.org
Sent: Wed, Feb 16, 2011 11:32 am
Subject: Re: Diagnosing conne
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 06:06:32PM -0500, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
> This is one system with both OS' installed, it came pre-installed with
> 32-bit Windows Vista, then I installed 64-bit Ubuntu afterwards.
>
> I bought a new NIC (Netgear) this afternoon and it came right up in
> Linux. The
Sorry for another blank/dupe message. I saw a blank message go through
again. Mobile interface bug. :(
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On 02/16/2011 11:18 AM, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
> This is a 64-bit dual core CPU. I cannot imagine anything that would
> hog up such a processor...
I've seen it on my quad-core Opteron.
--
Jerry Feldman
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id: 537C5846
PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 EC
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:18:39AM -0500, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
> This is a 64-bit dual core CPU. I cannot imagine anything that would
> hog up such a processor...
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio...
-b
--
nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merel
This is a 64-bit dual core CPU. I cannot imagine anything that would
hog up such a processor...
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On 02/15/2011 03:53 PM, Bill Bogstad wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:55 AM, wrote:
>> This happens with both Linux and Windows, so it cannot be system
>> software if two operating systems are involved.
> To be fair, both systems could have something wrong with them. Given
> that the more st
On 02/14/2011 08:03 PM, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
> David Kramer wrote:.
>
>
>> It sounds to me like it's losing DNS, not connectivity. Try accessing a
>> website via IP address instead of domain name next time this happens.
>>
> The connection just hung again, same result using an IP addre
Bill Bogstad wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:55 AM, wrote:
>
>> This happens with both Linux and Windows, so it cannot be system
>> software if two operating systems are involved.
>>
> To be fair, both systems could have something wrong with them. Given
> that the more straightforw
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 11:55 AM, wrote:
> This happens with both Linux and Windows, so it cannot be system
> software if two operating systems are involved.
To be fair, both systems could have something wrong with them. Given
that the more straightforward causes are being eliminated more
atyp
This happens with both Linux and Windows, so it cannot be system
software if two operating systems are involved.
When I pinged both the router and modem during these episodes, both
respond to pings without any packet loss from either.
I will try a new NIC as the spare I have, is not compatible
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:22 AM, wrote:
> I have not as yet tried a traceroute when this occurs, but will do so the
> next time. I have not experienced this same issue on my laptop using a
> wireless connection.
>
> But even when this occurs, /if/ the problem is further downstream, past the
pages should have no trouble
coming into the browsers and they are not even doing that when this problem
occurs, yet they ping fine during all this.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Metro
To: edwardp
Cc: L-blu
Sent: Tue, Feb 15, 2011 1:03 am
Subject: Re: Diagnosing connection issue
edwardp wrote:
> And even after this, it occurred again, this time it was at least a full
> minute before the page(s) started loading in.
So when it happens, have you attempted to run trace routes?
One approach I've used to catch intermittent problems like that is to do
a trace (to www.google.co
edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
> David Kramer wrote:.
>
>
>
>> It sounds to me like it's losing DNS, not connectivity. Try accessing a
>> website via IP address instead of domain name next time this happens.
>>
>>
> The connection just hung again, same result using an IP address. After
>
David Kramer wrote:.
> It sounds to me like it's losing DNS, not connectivity. Try accessing a
> website via IP address instead of domain name next time this happens.
>
The connection just hung again, same result using an IP address. After
a delay of 10-15 seconds, the page begins to load
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:12 AM, wrote:
> For a while now, I've been having an issue with an Ethernet connection. The
> PC is a 64-bit system, purchased new 15 months ago, so I still consider it
> new. :)
>
> After being online for a while, the connection "drops", this occurs with both
> Win
Sorry for the blank message earlier. Currently using a quirky mobile
interface.
It did not matter which DNS was used, it occurred using default
Comcast, Comcast DNSSEC, as well as Google's DNS service. This is what
makes it more strange...
___
Dis
Googles DNS was not pinged previously when this happened, so I cannot
say if the same loss would have occurred.
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On 02/14/2011 06:12 AM, edwa...@linuxmail.org wrote:
> For a while now, I've been having an issue with an Ethernet connection. The
> PC is a 64-bit system, purchased new 15 months ago, so I still consider it
> new. :)
>
> After being online for a while, the connection "drops", this occurs with
For a while now, I've been having an issue with an Ethernet connection. The PC
is a 64-bit system, purchased new 15 months ago, so I still consider it new. :)
After being online for a while, the connection "drops", this occurs with both
Windows Vista (32-bit, pre-installed when I bought it) an
41 matches
Mail list logo
