Accusé de réception
Votre Re: [tdf-discuss] Name Change for LibreOffice Applications
document
:
Hi,
(I am redirecting this to the website mailing list.)
Am 08.12.2010 08:36, schrieb Sebastian Spaeth:
> I bet the content of the static site would be rpelicated within a day,
> and improving the live site would be much more motivating than playing
> with something that has *test* in its name :
"Stefan Weigel" wrote in message
news:4cff5031.6000...@bildungskreis.org...
Hi,
(I am redirecting this to the website mailing list.)
Am 08.12.2010 08:36, schrieb Sebastian Spaeth:
I bet the content of the static site would be rpelicated within a day,
and improving the live site would be mu
Hello all,
I guess the conversation language is english? Is there a german list too?
Did anybody know something about a portable version? Is it this
difficult to setup one?
best greetings, Thomas
--
--[ Thomas Hofmann, Dorfen, tho...@th-o.de ]--
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h
I know of a site that does portable apps for windows. Seeing how to do
it there you might be able to get an idea of how things need to be done
to make it portable on other operating systems.
the site is http://portableapps.com/
On 12/8/10 10:53 AM, Thomas Hofmann wrote:
Hello all,
I guess th
Hi, :-)
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:19, Marc Paré wrote:
> I would like people to hold off for another week. David seems to have some
> ideas about what he would like to do with the site and its contents. I can
> help.
>
> The biggest problem with adding the content, IMO, is that there was no group
Hi Jih-Yao,
Le 07/12/10 09:05, Jih-Yao Lin a écrit :
> I need to use Mac's service in Libreoffice to communicate with other
> applications in Mac.
>
> But, now these service seems to be dead.
What exactly do you mean ? I can see the menu entry "Services" under the
main LibreOffice menu when I
Hello everyone,
I found out in LWN (http://lwn.net/Articles/414051/) that the LO team
was working on "The crufty old virtual object system - deprecated for
ten years - is being removed."
>From what I understand, that means revamping the API for developers. Am
I right?
I have a requirement to int
Hi Mirek,
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Mirek M. wrote:
> > []
> I think a better solution would be to:
> a) offer to download and install missing open-source fonts (using
> open-source fonts would be an advantage here): quick mockup at
> http://clickortap.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/citru
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:52:16 +0530, Marc-André Laverdière wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I found out in LWN (http://lwn.net/Articles/414051/) that the LO team
> was working on "The crufty old virtual object system - deprecated for
> ten years - is being removed."
>
> From what I understand, that me
Am 08.12.2010 10:49, schrieb Harold Fuchs:
>> By "static site" you mean http://www.documentfoundation.org ?
>> By "live site" you mean http://www.libreoffice.org ?
>
> These two links point at the same place. ???
Yes. But only as long as the LibO website did not go public.
As long as the LibO w
Hi Thomas,
2010/12/8 Thomas Hofmann :
> Hello all,
>
> I guess the conversation language is english? Is there a german list too?
yes, you guessed correct. ;)
There are a few germanspeaking lists too. Try
disc...@de.libreoffice.org or us...@libreoffice.org
> Did anybody know something about a por
Hallo Thomas,
Am 08.12.2010 10:53, schrieb Thomas Hofmann:
> I guess the conversation language is english? Is there a german list too?
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Local_Mailing_Lists/de
> Did anybody know something about a portable version? Is it this
> difficult to setup one?
As far as
Sorry,
2010/12/8 Sigrid Carrera :
> Hi Thomas,
>
> 2010/12/8 Thomas Hofmann :
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I guess the conversation language is english? Is there a german list too?
>
> yes, you guessed correct. ;)
> There are a few germanspeaking lists too. Try
> disc...@de.libreoffice.org or us...@li
Hi David, *,
David Nelson schrieb:
[.. libreoffice.org website lauch delay issues ..]
>We're going to get this site on the road really quickly now.
That are good news! :o))
Thanks for feeding the engine with gasoline. :o))
Gruß/regards
--
Friedrich
Libreoffice-Box http://libreofficebox.org/
"Stefan Weigel" wrote in message
news:4cff602c.7060...@bildungskreis.org...
Am 08.12.2010 10:49, schrieb Harold Fuchs:
By "static site" you mean http://www.documentfoundation.org ?
By "live site" you mean http://www.libreoffice.org ?
These two links point at the same place. ???
Yes. But
Hi Harold, :-)
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 18:58, Harold Fuchs wrote:
> Interesting that the Support tab doesn't mention
> - forums
> - technical FAQs
> - installation instructions
> - documentation
> - system requirements
>
> I'm also fascinated, having retired from software development 10 years ago
Harold,
Am 08.12.2010 11:58, schrieb Harold Fuchs:
> Interesting that the Support tab doesn't mention
> - forums
> - technical FAQs
> - installation instructions
> - documentation
> - system requirements
The site is under construction. What do you expect?
You are invited to contribute! Please f
Hi Harold, :-)
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 18:58, Harold Fuchs wrote:
> Interesting that the Support tab doesn't mention
> - forums
> - technical FAQs
> - installation instructions
> - documentation
> - system requirements
In that "technical FAQs" section, can you give me more details about
what you
Sorry people,
...
As long as the LibO website is under construction you will find it
here: http://www.test.libreoffice.org
But I think that's not the first page for www.libreoffice.org at this
state of the project.
Why?
LO and TDF are at the beginning. So many people don't know what it is
a
Hi David,
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:33 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
> I must admit that I don't really agree with you, Michael. There is
> always need for organization and coordination in any human enterprise.
Sure - we are all agreed on this :-) the question is whether that
requires formal
Hello Jonathan,
thanks so far. I knew PortableApps, yes. But the guides are
in my opinion more loose than strict.
Step 3: The Analysis
The next step is to determine what needs to be altered to make a
program portable. Does it store its settings in the registry? Does i
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Thomas Hofmann wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I guess the conversation language is english? Is there a german list too?
>
> Did anybody know something about a portable version? Is it this
> difficult to setup one?
>
> best greetings, Thomas
> --
> --[ Thomas Hofmann, Dorfe
Sorry people 2,
Sorry people,
...
*Get It!* two lines below should stand on the right side of the website,
big and as a Link.
writing texts
drawing *Get It !* [as a Link to the Download-Side]
spreadsheet
and many more
Than follows the rest:
...
Johannes
--
Unsubscribe instruction
The current version of openoffice DEV300M95 for Linux 64-bit currently works.
Earlier versions of the 64-bit code had bugs that prevented 64 from running,
but these have apparently been resolved.
LibO_3.3.0rc1_Linux_x86-64 is based on that earlier version that still had bugs.
So, thought you m
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:52 -0500, Susan Cragin wrote:
> LibO_3.3.0rc1_Linux_x86-64 is based on that earlier version that still had
> bugs.
So, may I ask what the bugs are?
> So, thought you might want to know.
Sure, but more details would be nice, or else it's impossible for us to fix.
Thank
?? I'm running 64 bits versions of OOo since 3.0 without problems.
Go-oo had problems with 64 bits builds (pdf export on openSUSE was a
nightmare for a long time) but vanilla builds always worked for me and
LibO also.
2010/12/8 Susan Cragin :
> The current version of openoffice DEV300M95 for Linux
>On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:52 -0500, Susan Cragin wrote:
>> LibO_3.3.0rc1_Linux_x86-64 is based on that earlier version that still had
>> bugs.
>
>So, may I ask what the bugs are?
I don't know. I'm not a programmer, nor affiliated with OO.
Just a user who just switched from Ubuntu 32-bit to Ubunt
On 12/08/2010 11:18 AM, Susan Cragin wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:52 -0500, Susan Cragin wrote:
LibO_3.3.0rc1_Linux_x86-64 is based on that earlier version that still had bugs.
So, may I ask what the bugs are?
I don't know. I'm not a programmer, nor affiliated with OO.
Just a user who just
>I am running 64 bit openSUSE version LO 3.3 RC1 and have had no trouble
>at allso maybe it's unique to
>your system? The beta versions ran tooand all of the features seem
>to workIntel Core 2 duo
>
>Bob
Bob--
May I asked how you installed yours? I have been using the unofficial deb
Precompiled RPM's on the openSUSE repository...built for the distro.
So maybe that's an issue.
Bob
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Susan Cragin wrote:
> >I am running 64 bit openSUSE version LO 3.3 RC1 and have had no trouble
> >at allso maybe it's unique to
> >your system? The beta ve
OOo DEV300m95 include the long awaited fix for issue 972
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
automated vertical alignment for Math objects on Writer documents. The
quick tests I did show that the patch works quite well!
I know it is too late for including this patch on LibO, but is
Hi Johannes, *
Johannes A. Bodwing schrieb:
Sorry people,
...
As long as the LibO website is under construction you will find it
here: http://www.test.libreoffice.org
But I think that's not the first page for www.libreoffice.org at this
state of the project.
Why?
LO and TDF are at the beginn
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:23 +0100, RGB ES wrote:
> OOo DEV300m95 include the long awaited fix for issue 972
> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=972
> automated vertical alignment for Math objects on Writer documents. The
> quick tests I did show that the patch works quite well!
> I k
Hello,
...
Johannes A. Bodwing schrieb:
Sorry people,
...
As long as the LibO website is under construction you will find it
here: http://www.test.libreoffice.org
But I think that's not the first page for www.libreoffice.org at this
state of the project.
Why?
LO and TDF are at the beginning
Hi Bernhard,
...
Please propose your valid ideas on the website mailing list or - if
you have some spare time - perhaps you could work on the site directly
(with the built-in editor SilverStripe is quite easy to be used).
I have no spare time, but I'll try to squeeze it into 24 hours of t
Hi Thorsten, :-)
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 03:07, Thorsten Behrens
wrote:
> Hi David, all,
>
> there's a fine line here, and somewhat of a difference e.g. between
> US- and european countries, when it comes to the aforementioned
> points. We've made it a rule in TDF, to not prematurely
> over-regul
Hi Bernard, :-)
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 04:35, Bernhard Dippold
wrote:
> Please propose your valid ideas on the website mailing list or - if you have
> some spare time - perhaps you could work on the site directly (with the
> built-in editor SilverStripe is quite easy to be used).
Please do not s
Hi Johannes, *
Johannes A. Bodwing schrieb:
Hi Bernhard,
...
Please propose your valid ideas on the website mailing list or - if
you have some spare time - perhaps you could work on the site directly
(with the built-in editor SilverStripe is quite easy to be used).
I have no spare time, b
Johannes A. Bodwing December 8, 2010 10:20 PM:
Stands LO in the competition with every other Office-Suite? Or will it
be a work for fun till the fun is gone and than there will be something
else (like it was said some times ago on OOo in a greater dispute)?
Of course.
If LO accepts this cha
Johannes A. Bodwing December 8, 2010 10:20 PM:
Stands LO in the competition with every other Office-Suite? Or will it
be a work for fun till the fun is gone and than there will be something
else (like it was said some times ago on OOo in a greater dispute)?
Of course.
If LO accepts this cha
Hi Johannes, all,
Johannes A. Bodwing schrieb:
[...]
But another Sorry - I think this point ("Wow") has to be discussed
basicly, not only for the website. Because the style of the website will
just follow the fundamental goals of LO/TDF.
The basic goals of the foundation are presented on the
42 matches
Mail list logo
