Hi,
Am 27.03.2011 08:22, schrieb Samphan Raruenrom:
> I found this page
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/faq/general-faq/how-do-you-pronounce-libreoffice/
> that link to Google translate to provide the (official?) pronouncement.
I don´t think, that this is "official" in sense of approved by
I saw users having problem pronouncing the software name "LibreOffice"
in Thailand. I found this page
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/faq/general-faq/how-do-you-pronounce-libreoffice/
that link to Google translate to provide the (official?) pronouncement.
http://translate.google.com/#fr|en
x
Mail:
lali.belt...@gmail.com
msn:
lali.belt...@gmail.com
aim:
lali.belt...@gmail.com
yahoo:
lali.belt...@yahoo.com
skype:
lali.belteki1
paltalk:
laller86
icq:
583849718
-
eMail ist virenfrei.
Von AVG uberpruft - www.avg.de
Version: 10.0.1204 / Virendatenbank: 1498/3532 - Ausgabedatum: 26.
On 3/26/11 8:35 PM, yahoo-pier_andreit wrote:
Sounds like a very reasonable proposal due to the fact that 2003 ML is
rarely used.
rarely??? I think is the most used in the world!!!
MS Office 2003 XML format has nothing to do with DOC, XLS and PPT. It is
a different format, based on XML, wh
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:35:30 +0100, yahoo-pier_andreit wrote:
>Il 26/03/2011 20:09, Jonathan Hudson ha scritto:
>> On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:36:39 + (UTC), Peter Jentsch wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm currently investigating a bug with the Excel 2003 import filter
>>> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org
Il 26/03/2011 20:09, Jonathan Hudson ha scritto:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:36:39 + (UTC), Peter Jentsch wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently investigating a bug with the Excel 2003 import filter
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35543). Looking closer at
the filter and how much work needed to
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:36:39 + (UTC), Peter Jentsch wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm currently investigating a bug with the Excel 2003 import filter
>(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35543). Looking closer at
>the filter and how much work needed to be done to improve it, and
>considering th
On 26 March 2011 16:36, Peter Jentsch wrote:
IMHO I don't think drop office 2003 format is a good idea: a lot of
people around still use it. And while you can install the
compatibility pack, as you say on your PC, is not possible to force
others to install a program, so it can become hardest to e
On Saturday, March 26, 2011 09:30:31 AM Carl Symons wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jaime R. Garza
wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
> >
> > You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
> >
> > I don't rea
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
wrote:
...
>>>
>> Although MS stopped free support for MS Office 2003 some time ago, its
>> use is still widespread. It would be a mistake for LibO to support the
>> ill-defined, shifting OOXML and deprecate MS 2003 support.
>>
>> Carl
>>
>>
> C
On 3/26/11 5:30 PM, Carl Symons wrote:
Although MS stopped free support for MS Office 2003 some time ago, its
use is still widespread. It would be a mistake for LibO to support the
ill-defined, shifting OOXML and deprecate MS 2003 support.
I might be wrong, but Peter was referring to MS Office
On 3/26/11 5:30 PM, Carl Symons wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
Hi Peter,
I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
I don't really see any good reason for doing such a complete
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
>
> You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
>
> I don't really see any good reason for doing such a completely strategically
> wrong decisi
Hi Peter,
I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
I don't really see any good reason for doing such a completely strategically
wrong decision.
Cheers!
Jaime
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 16:36, Peter Jentsch wr
Hi,
I'm currently investigating a bug with the Excel 2003 import filter
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35543). Looking closer at
the filter and how much work needed to be done to improve it, and
considering the fact that Office 2003 ML has been superseeded by OOXML,
fixing that
Steve Edmonds writes:
> Thanks, I get by with PS2PDF but don't get the table of contents
> working.
Yes, AFAIK postscript doesn't support that. If there's some tool that is
able to extract and add bookmark information to a PDF, you can try
generating the PDF directly from LibO and injecting its
Hi all,
Our "EasyHacks" page here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Easy_Hacks
is quite a mess by now as we have so many of them. Also I dont think it
is very inviting to newcomers. An really important "EasyHack" -- that
does not even require elite programming skills would be to s
17 matches
Mail list logo
