I know that there were reasons for the fork and I respect that. I was
wondering if libreoffice and aooo can't agree to some basic level api
for 3rd party developers?
Probably not, but I think it's worth asking.
Fred
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Keith Curtis keit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon,
Hi guys,
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 09:19 -0800, Fred Ollinger wrote:
I was wondering if libreoffice and aooo can't agree to
some basic level api for 3rd party developers?
It's an interesting discussion; but in the absence of any concrete
code, patches etc. it doesn't belong on the
On 03/06/2013 09:00 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 05.03.2013 18:29, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 09:19 -0800, Fred Ollinger wrote:
I was wondering if libreoffice and aooo can't agree to
some basic level api for 3rd party developers?
It's an interesting discussion; but in the
The 'problem' is that I've been approached by a number of
corp, gov't and non-profits who wish to contribute to LO
but want their donations to also be covered under the ALv2.
They have heard back that code under ALv2 will not be accepted
by TDF and LO and that patches must be under LGPLv3+MPL to
For corporate entities, this is not optimal... they need legal to
sign off on any donations, and such a single donation is
much easier. If a donation is triple-licensed mpl+alv2+lgpgv2
would that be accepted by TDF?
On Mar 6, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Florian Reisinger reisi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi Jim,
Jim Jagielski wrote on 2013-03-06 16:05:
I have a patch which is written for LibreOffice. However,
I want to provide that patch to LO under both LGPLv3 AND ALv2.
Based *solely* on the fact that it is dual-licensed and
nothing else, is such a patch acceptable.
as our licensing page
This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation thereof.
And also a plea for help.
I'm trying to get LibreOffice to work with SAP Business One (hereafter called
B1) in order to eliminate the need to pay for expensive licenses for Microsoft
Excel.
B1 has a toolbar button
Am 07.03.2013 17:43, schrieb Charles Jenkins:
This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation thereof.
Please keep in mind, that LibreOffice has evolved from OpenOffice.org
(now Apache Open Office), which in turn is derived from StarOffice.
So you in addition might
On 7 March 2013 16:43, Charles Jenkins cejw...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation
thereof. And also a plea for help.
I'm trying to get LibreOffice to work with SAP Business One (hereafter
called B1) in order to eliminate the need to pay for
2013/3/7 Nino Novak nn.l...@kflog.org:
Am 07.03.2013 17:43, schrieb Charles Jenkins:
This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation
thereof.
Please keep in mind, that LibreOffice has evolved from OpenOffice.org (now
Apache Open Office), which in turn is derived from
2013/3/7 Tony Pursell a...@princeswalk.fsnet.co.uk:
On 7 March 2013 16:43, Charles Jenkins cejw...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation
thereof. And also a plea for help.
I'm trying to get LibreOffice to work with SAP Business One (hereafter
Hi Charles,
Charles Jenkins schrieb:
This is a story about the usability of LO BASIC and the documentation
thereof. And also a plea for help.
I'm trying to get LibreOffice to work with SAP Business One
(hereafter called B1) in order to eliminate the need to pay for
expensive licenses for
The documentation on LO
BASIC is so sparse that I can't find anything about opening
spreadsheets. The LO help file promises documentation at
OpenOffice.org; but clicking that link takes me instead to
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/BASIC_Guide, which
is a placeholder page
Using the address by which I am subscribed to discuss @df.o
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 19:48
To: LOffice Developers List (libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org)
Cc: 'discuss@documentfoundation.org'
Subject: Grant of
14 matches
Mail list logo
