On 26.07.2013 00:06, theUser BL wrote:
> At first: Congratulation to LibreOffice 4.1.
>
> In the forums to german news, the most people want to see LibreOffice and
> ApacheOpenOffice to merge.
>
Merging parts of the code is one thing, merging the projects is another.
IMO a good and fair collab
On 26.07.2013 00:32, Toki Kantoor wrote:
> On 07/25/2013 10:06 PM, theUser BL wrote:
>
>> The big question is: Why doing LibreOffice that?
>
> The short answer is that the licenses that each organization uses allows
> that to happen.
>
> The longer answer is that free qua libre has implications
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 09:53 +0200, RA Stehmann wrote:
> So: why does LibreOffice use the MPL?
The MPLv2 has many advantages and some weaknesses, as do all licenses
depending of course on what you want to achieve. Having said that,
personally I believe it is a great choice for
Apache OpenOffice has announced the details of CVE-2013-2189 and
CVE-2013-4156 as they affect Apache OpenOffice, i.e.
CVE-2013-2189: CVE-2013-2189: OpenOffice DOC Memory Corruption
Vulnerability
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.maven.announce/1503
CVE-2013-4156: OpenOffice DOCM Memory
