Re: [tdf-discuss] New "LibreOffice Reader" Eliminates Need for "PDF Reader"

2011-06-25 Thread Sean White
just too big for >> that. [ ... ] >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documen

Re: [tdf-discuss]

2011-06-25 Thread Sean White
tiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > > -- Sean White, I've Seen the Cow Level -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format

2010-12-31 Thread Sean White
be advanced and that it isn't user friendly. In OOo/LO's case people see that it doesn't have the features they need (.docx support) and, camparative to MSO, looks a-shambles, with a GUI akin to the MSO 97-2003 era. On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: > >

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Do not support writing to OOXML format

2010-12-30 Thread Sean White
a > Website: http://larry-gusaas.com > "An artist is never ahead of his time but most people are far behind > theirs." - Edgard Varese * > > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to > discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org > Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/

Re: [tdf-discuss] Version Numbers?

2010-11-23 Thread Sean White
cided on already it is rather a moot point. Again I am sorry for the arrogant tone that obviously came across with my message. On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:24:00 +1100, Sean White > wrote: > > One of the things i LOVE about open s

Re: [tdf-discuss] LibreOffice 3.3 final & portable version

2010-11-23 Thread Sean White
gt; *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** > > -- Sean White, I've Seen the Cow Level -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Re: [tdf-discuss] Version Numbers?

2010-11-23 Thread Sean White
discussed that some weeks ago. > > > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Version_Numbering_Scheme_for_LibreOffice > : > > Hope that helps! > > Christoph > > Am Samstag, den 20.11.2010, 10:26 +1100 schrieb Sean White: > > As a concerned user, if LibreOffi

Re: [tdf-discuss] Version Numbers?

2010-11-22 Thread Sean White
that is for these ported plugins On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:01 PM, wrote: > That's a good solution, that will have to come in place whenever > incompatibles arise. > > BTW: I depend totally on others when there's something to code or port. > > Regards, > bastik &g

Re: [tdf-discuss] Version Numbers?

2010-11-22 Thread Sean White
e it can stick to 3.x.x and move > onward. > > Regards, > bastik > -- > GRATIS! Movie-FLAT mit über 300 Videos. > Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to > discuss+h...@documentfoundation.or

Re: [tdf-discuss] after beta3

2010-11-22 Thread Sean White
s/discuss/ > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** > > -- Sean White, I've Seen the Cow Level -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Version Numbers?

2010-11-20 Thread Sean White
taring >> >me in the face every time I start up my non-proprietary office suite >> > >> >On 11/20/10, NoOp wrote: >> >On 11/19/2010 06:22 PM, Michel Gagnon wrote: >> >> Le 2010-11-19 19:35, NoOp a écrit : >> >>> On 11/19/2010 03:26 P

Re: [tdf-discuss] Re: Version Numbers?

2010-11-19 Thread Sean White
every time I start up my non-proprietary office suite On 11/20/10, NoOp wrote: > On 11/19/2010 06:22 PM, Michel Gagnon wrote: >> Le 2010-11-19 19:35, NoOp a écrit : >>> On 11/19/2010 03:26 PM, Sean White wrote: >>>> As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independe

[tdf-discuss] Version Numbers?

2010-11-19 Thread Sean White
As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independent office project derived from the OpenOffice code then why do we still use their version numbering system. Wouldn't it be better to start from 1 to reinforce in peoples minds that we are a separate project. -- Sean White, Concerned