On 02/24/2011 04:04 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi Sonic4Spuds,
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:46:02 -0600
Sonic4Spuds wrote:
I am useing a ubuntu based system (Mint) and installed the LO PPA but
the new version doesn't show. the available packages are still 3.3.0.
No, they are not. There has
Hello everyone,
I am useing a ubuntu based system (Mint) and installed the LO PPA but
the new version doesn't show. the available packages are still 3.3.0.
I also would suggest making the testing and rc versions available on a
ppa even if a separate one. Also when installed this way LO remove
On 12/07/2010 02:23 PM, Mirek M. wrote:
2010/12/7 Marc Paré
Le 2010-12-07 13:12, Christophe Strobbe a écrit :
Hi,
At 18:50 7/12/2010, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Rainer Bielefeld schrieb:
[...] but switch from Sxxx.exe to Lxxx.exe (LWRITER.EXEm ...)
But if that might cause any trouble (for
On 12/02/2010 10:27 AM, Sigrid Carrera wrote:
Hi Marc,
2010/12/2 Marc Paré
Le 2010-12-02 02:29, Jean-Baptiste Faure a écrit :
Although a good idea, I would still like to see an installer do this
rather than the language pack.
Hmm, on MS-Windows language packs are installed by an installer in
On 11/24/2010 03:47 PM, Barbara Duprey wrote:
On 11/24/2010 12:27 PM, David Nelson wrote:
Hi, :-)
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:27, Carl Symons wrote:
I use LibreOffice, but I don't use an "office productivity solution"
I'd prefer "personal productivity software" or "personal productivity
packa
On 11/22/2010 02:06 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-11-22 10:07 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
There is no goddamn need for it.
And there's no need for profanity either...
+2:-)
I agree with this suggestion.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: ht
On 11/22/2010 11:50 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:52:41PM +, Lee Hyde wrote:
original poster is making. Windows users are presented with a single
setup.exe while debian/ubuntu users are presented with a multitude of
individual .deb files. This is not user friendly!
No
On 11/22/2010 06:31 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 09:03:35AM -0600, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
unsuspecting users to the same problem that OOo has been famous for:
there is no obvious way to start to install the files. Dependencies for
dpkg -i *.deb?
each .deb have to
o
do the trick.
Make files are only useful if you are building from source. I am
personally not good at doing this, and I don't have a powerful enough
computer (Asus 1201T).
-Sonic4Spuds
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.do
e
to know what fonts are installed. Any javascript or website can find
this with a simple command. This isn't because of any thing in the
office suite.
-Sonic4Spuds
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/
On 11/19/2010 06:39 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 11/18/2010 12:12 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Andy Brown wrote (18-11-10 20:34)
Is anyone besides me having a problem opening the DEB archives for Beta
3? I keep getting an error tar: This does not look like a tar archive.
I had the same problem with beta 2.
So a
11 matches
Mail list logo
