Re: [tdf-discuss] Still can't get 64-bit deb to work

2010-12-11 Thread Susan Cragin
I actually didn't solve the problem. The program runs, but only when I am root. -Original Message- >From: Susan Cragin >Sent: Dec 11, 2010 6:27 PM >To: discuss@documentfoundation.org >Subject: Re: [tdf-discuss] Still can't get 64-bit deb to work > &

Re: [tdf-discuss] Still can't get 64-bit deb to work

2010-12-11 Thread Susan Cragin
I have solved the problem. Installing the 64-bit deb sets permissions way too high. I did some chmod and now it works fine. For some reasons the 32-bit did not have this problem. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundati

[tdf-discuss] Still can't get 64-bit deb to work

2010-12-11 Thread Susan Cragin
ition). One problem NN 64-bit seems to have is handling python bindings, which is being worked on now. So LO may just start to work spontaneously. But anyway, if anyone has any suggestions I can try in the meantime, let me know. Thanks, Susan Cragin -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-ma

Re: [tdf-discuss] 64bit now works in OO

2010-12-08 Thread Susan Cragin
>I am running 64 bit openSUSE version LO 3.3 RC1 and have had no trouble >at allso maybe it's unique to >your system? The beta versions ran tooand all of the features seem >to workIntel Core 2 duo > >Bob Bob-- May I asked how you installed yours? I have been using the unofficial deb

Re: [tdf-discuss] 64bit now works in OO

2010-12-08 Thread Susan Cragin
>On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 11:52 -0500, Susan Cragin wrote: >> LibO_3.3.0rc1_Linux_x86-64 is based on that earlier version that still had >> bugs. > >So, may I ask what the bugs are? I don't know. I'm not a programmer, nor affiliated with OO. Just a user who just

[tdf-discuss] 64bit now works in OO

2010-12-08 Thread Susan Cragin
The current version of openoffice DEV300M95 for Linux 64-bit currently works. Earlier versions of the 64-bit code had bugs that prevented 64 from running, but these have apparently been resolved. LibO_3.3.0rc1_Linux_x86-64 is based on that earlier version that still had bugs. So, thought you m