On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Gianluca Turconi
wrote:
> There should be, at least, a central info access point.
+1
LiberOffice is a huge project and email based discussion/management
will not fit.
We will easily lose the control over it.
As discusses, I give a GO for using bugzilla as bug trac
Gianluca Turconi wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 10:09:34 +0200
> André wrote:
>
>> Oh, Bugzilla *is* enabled:
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org
>> Product: LibreOffice
>
> So, is FreeDesktop the official home for LibreOffice devs or it a
> provisional one?
>
> There should be, at least, a centra
On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 10:09:34 +0200
André wrote:
> Oh, Bugzilla *is* enabled:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org
> Product: LibreOffice
So, is FreeDesktop the official home for LibreOffice devs or it a
provisional one?
There should be, at least, a central info access point.
Regards
--
Gianluca T
Hi,
Am 03.10.2010 00:21, schrieb Dr. Bernhard Dippold:
There are some threads about bugs here on the list, and as long as
there is no bugzilla enabled with an easy frontend, I think we'll see
more of them here.
Oh, Bugzilla *is* enabled:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org
Product: LibreOffice
Hi Cor,
> Hi Bernard, *,
>
> Bernhard Dippold wrote (01-10-10 23:20)
>
> > [BUGS]
> > discussions/proposals about *bugs* in LibreOffice
> >
> > [FEATURES]
> > discussions/proposals about new *features* for LibreOffice
>
> Both are strongly development related.
> Core development has found its p
