Hi
Am 12.07.11 20:38, schrieb drew:
hmmm - that is assuming that the two separate projects will maintain
enough common code base that shared extensions are possible - that is a
requirement that I for one would not want to see enforced. The fact that
we can share extensions today is, IMO, a
Uwe Altmann schrieb:
Hi
Am 12.07.11 20:38, schrieb drew:
hmmm - that is assuming that the two separate projects will maintain
enough common code base that shared extensions are possible - that is a
requirement that I for one would not want to see enforced. The fact that
we can share
Olivier Hallot schrieb:
Em 13-07-2011 05:33, RA Stehmann escreveu:
Uwe Altmann schrieb:
Hi
Am 12.07.11 20:38, schrieb drew:
hmmm - that is assuming that the two separate projects will maintain
enough common code base that shared extensions are possible - that is a
requirement that I
Hi,
if there were an interest in standardizing a macro API for office
applications, I would be much in favor. But I wouldn't want to
standardize the current API. It's unnecessarily complicated and takes
a sizeable amount of time to learn, even for a seasoned programmer.
I'd rather create something
Hi,
There is some discussion going on at the Apache OOo mail list
regarding the place to host extensions
(http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/).
It seems that the current hosting of extensions is facing some
problems, and it will be great if we find a new (and common) home for
the
On 12 Jul 2011, at 19:08, Jomar Silva wrote:
Hi,
There is some discussion going on at the Apache OOo mail list
regarding the place to host extensions
(http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/).
It seems that the current hosting of extensions is facing some
problems, and it will be
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 15:08 -0300, Jomar Silva wrote:
Hi,
There is some discussion going on at the Apache OOo mail list
regarding the place to host extensions
(http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/).
It seems that the current hosting of extensions is facing some
problems, and it
Hello Jomar,
With the exception of the quite good points highlighted by Drew (some
extensions might break or might not work in AOOo) , I think AOOo is free to
point to our own extensions and templates website. Do know, however, that
although we accept FOSS licences only (including Apache!) we do
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 20:57 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello Jomar,
With the exception of the quite good points highlighted by Drew (some
extensions might break or might not work in AOOo) , I think AOOo is free to
point to our own extensions and templates website. Do know, however,
Hello,
Simon and Jomar, feel free to pass the invite along to the AOOo lists unless
somebody else objects?
best
Charles.
2011/7/12 drew d...@baseanswers.com
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 20:57 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
Hello Jomar,
With the exception of the quite good points highlighted
Luis E Vásquez r wrote:
Medellín,july 12 2011
Why not to use :
http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:OpenOfficeExtensions/List
Have you looked at the above link? Check where the links lead to.
Best regards.
Luis E. Vásquez R.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
11 matches
Mail list logo
