In my opinion Must, Should, Could, Completely Irrelevant:
- *Must*: RTF
- *Must*: MS Office 97/2000/XP Binary
- *Completely Irrelevant*: MS Office 2003 XML
- *Should*: OOXML ECMA-376 / ISO/IEC 29500 Transitional
- *Must*: OOXML ISO/IEC 29500 Strict
Cheers!
Jaime
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 09:13,
Le 2011-03-28 15:29, aqualung a écrit :
Jaime R. Garza wrote:
In my opinion Must, Should, Could, Completely Irrelevant:
- *Must*: RTF
- *Must*: MS Office 97/2000/XP Binary
- *Completely Irrelevant*: MS Office 2003 XML
- *Should*: OOXML ECMA-376 / ISO/IEC 29500 Transitional
- *Must*: OOXML
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:36:39 + (UTC), Peter Jentsch wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently investigating a bug with the Excel 2003 import filter
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35543). Looking closer at
the filter and how much work needed to be done to improve it, and
considering the
Il 26/03/2011 20:09, Jonathan Hudson ha scritto:
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:36:39 + (UTC), Peter Jentsch wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently investigating a bug with the Excel 2003 import filter
(https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35543). Looking closer at
the filter and how much work needed
On 3/26/11 8:35 PM, yahoo-pier_andreit wrote:
Sounds like a very reasonable proposal due to the fact that 2003 ML is
rarely used.
rarely??? I think is the most used in the world!!!
MS Office 2003 XML format has nothing to do with DOC, XLS and PPT. It is
a different format, based on XML,
