plino wrote (06-08-11 00:24)
Cor Nouws wrote:
Glad to read that, because indeed, your reasoning above is completely
illogical :-D
Since regressions that occurred between 3.3.x and 3.4.x were not simply
reverted and that only regressions between 3.4.x releases are fixed at
this stage, what
Cor Nouws wrote:
So now you skip the stupid wrong initial reasoning you made in your
previous post and start with another idea that to me just looks as the
next poisonous attempt to do as if developers are incompetent
uninterested people?
I just rewrote what I meant since the previous
E.g. I know it doesn't really matter to the devs that a user can no longer
load a docx document which contains an OLE object because docx is from the
evil MS.
You do?
You are barking up the wrong tree here. I have not seen any actual developers
use language like evil MS or M$ and
Tor Lillqvist-2 wrote:
You are barking up the wrong tree here. I have not seen any actual
developers
use language like evil MS or M$ and argumentation like that.
Agreed. It was a small provocation :)
But it confuses me that bugs (and especially regressions) such as the one I
mentioned are
plino wrote (06-08-11 10:13)
Cor Nouws wrote:
So now you skip the stupid wrong initial reasoning you made in your
previous post and start with another idea that to me just looks as the
next poisonous attempt to do as if developers are incompetent
uninterested people?
I just rewrote what I
Keep using your ad hominem arguments and ignore the issues that user are
reporting.
You are absolutely right.
Version 3.4.2 is perfect. My mistake.
Bye!
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Viability-of-the-3-4-2-Release-tp3215651p3232189.html
Sent from the
Ok,and You arethe truth.El 07/08/11 1:29, plino escribi:Keep using your ad
hominem arguments and ignore the issues that user are
reporting.
You are absolutely right.
Version 3.4.2 is perfect. My mistake.
Bye!
--
View this message in
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
* frequent bugfix release on the code line happens (3.4.1, 3.4.2
etc). Code only enters that code line after review, no new
features are allowed. If something regresses, usually the fix is
simply reverted.
That is an interesting point. It simply means
plino wrote (05-08-11 20:18)
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
* frequent bugfix release on the code line happens (3.4.1, 3.4.2
etc). Code only enters that code line after review, no new
features are allowed. If something regresses, usually the fix is
simply reverted.
That is an
Cor Nouws wrote:
Glad to read that, because indeed, your reasoning above is completely
illogical :-D
Since regressions that occurred between 3.3.x and 3.4.x were not simply
reverted and that only regressions between 3.4.x releases are fixed at
this stage, what are the chances that
On 08/01/2011 03:42 AM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Given that the release of LibreOffice 3.4.2 is targeted at enterprise
users, I find it surprising that the product is thought to be ready for
release. At lease 2 significant bugs have been introduced and remain
present that would, to my
I have reported on Bugzilla that docx files which have an equation don't show
any text after the equation.
This was a regression from version 3.3.x and is present in version 3.4.2
which is an enterprise release :D
I guess enterprise users don't care about equations or don't use docx (which
makes
On 01/08/11 18:23, NoOp wrote:
On 08/01/2011 03:42 AM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Given that the release of LibreOffice 3.4.2 is targeted at enterprise
users, I find it surprising that the product is thought to be ready for
release. At lease 2 significant bugs have been introduced and remain
13 matches
Mail list logo
