Hi Peter,
I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
I don't really see any good reason for doing such a completely strategically
wrong decision.
Cheers!
Jaime
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 16:36, Peter Jentsch
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
I don't really see any good reason for doing such a completely strategically
On 3/26/11 5:30 PM, Carl Symons wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jaime R. Garzagar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
I don't really see any good reason for
On 3/26/11 5:30 PM, Carl Symons wrote:
Although MS stopped free support for MS Office 2003 some time ago, its
use is still widespread. It would be a mistake for LibO to support the
ill-defined, shifting OOXML and deprecate MS 2003 support.
I might be wrong, but Peter was referring to MS
snip
On Saturday, March 26, 2011 09:30:31 AM Carl Symons wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jaime R. Garza gar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Peter,
I don't really understand the logic behind your suggestion.
You want LO to drop support for the defacto-standard file format???
I
On 26 March 2011 16:36, Peter Jentsch pj...@guineapics.de wrote:
IMHO I don't think drop office 2003 format is a good idea: a lot of
people around still use it. And while you can install the
compatibility pack, as you say on your PC, is not possible to force
others to install a program, so it can
